The build passes for me on the latest develop branch using ant. Are you building with ant or maven?
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Scratch that. > > It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from > IItemRendererProvider > >> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com >> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue with >> Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns. >> >>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Harbs, >>> >>> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is used >>> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment >>> >>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; >>> >>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is >>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as >>> >>> <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as> >>> [2] >>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 >>> >>> <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): >>> >>>> Piotr, >>>> >>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think we all >>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all positions >>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate are new, >>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get what we >>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link basic, so >>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible, >>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions of >>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I was in >>>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel since >>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too much of >>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that this >>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that could be >>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't want to >>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with those >>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you to put >>>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking how to >>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when >>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change in >>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that Basic is >>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can use it. >>>> And Jewel can't use. >>>> >>>> Don't see other way. >>>> >>>> Let's see this as we end this release. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Carlos >>>> >>>> >>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >>>> escribió: >>>> >>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>> >>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with >>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. >>>>> >>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Piotr >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so >>>> when >>>>> we >>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. >>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move it >>>> from >>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. >>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. >>>>>> >>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but >>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it working. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>> >>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into the >>>>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the integration >>>>> branch >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from >>>>> Basic >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under the >>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in this >>>>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these >>>> issues. >>>>>> I >>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>>> >>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can >>>>> pull >>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix >>>>>> that >>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>> Probably I >>>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :) >>>>> If >>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop >>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining >>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it >>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in >>>>>> interface >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >>>>>>>> implements >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface >>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >>>>>>>> implements >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent >>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT >>>>>> .... >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework >>>>>> ........................... >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts >>>>>> .................... >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs >>>>>> ..................... >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core >>>>>> ............... >>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ >>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding >>>>>> ............ >>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was >>>> compiling >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still >>>>> unsolved. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced >>>> some >>>>>> MX >>>>>>>> API >>>>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to >>>> add >>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> For now >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic >>>>>>> library >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> could be >>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to >>>>>>>> compile with >>>>>>>>> maven >>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll >>>> return >>>>> to >>>>>>> my >>>>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>>> duties >>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< >>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if >>>> I >>>>>> find >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>> isuue. >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version >>>> of >>>>>>>> Royale. One >>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale >>>>>> branch >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> develop. I >>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale >>>>> and >>>>>>>> develop >>>>>>>>> now is >>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch >>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I >>>> would >>>>>> like >>>>>>>> to ask >>>>>>>>> you to >>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - >>>> whether I >>>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>>> break any >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please >>>> make >>>>>>>> changes and >>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some >>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>>> examples ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see >>>> what >>>>> is >>>>>>>> happen. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration >>>>> branch, >>>>>>>> moreover >>>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then >>>>> solve >>>>>>>>> conflicts in >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is >>>> compiling >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration >>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for >>>>>>>> projects. I >>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>> Agent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master >>>> may >>>>> be >>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>> wherever >>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler >>>>> and >>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the >>>>>> other >>>>>>>> builds >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of >>>>>> those >>>>>>>>> builds. If >>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the >>>>> agent >>>>>>>> that's >>>>>>>>> fine as >>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not >>>> run >>>>> on >>>>>>>> master. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] >>>>>> It's >>>>>>>>> pointing for >>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in >>>>>>> Program >>>>>>>>> Files. How >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> path >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is >>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you >>>> will >>>>> be >>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>> with all >>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < >>>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with >>>> ACE >>>>>> on >>>>>>>> multiple >>>>>>>>>>>> machines. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first >>>>> running >>>>>>>> ant on >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not >>>>> really >>>>>>>> sure what >>>>>>>>>>>> triggered >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on >>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? >>>>>>>>>> Dunno… >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop >>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>> works >>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next >>>>>>> couple >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be >>>>>>>>> cherry-picked from >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, >>>>>> but I >>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>> find it >>>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the >>>>> builds >>>>>>>> began to >>>>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able >>>> to >>>>>> fix >>>>>>>> it was >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the >>>>> screen >>>>>>> (to >>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>> tests) >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and >>>>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues >>>>>> here >>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> probably a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. >>>>> I >>>>>>>> think it >>>>>>>>> did all >>>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is >>>>>> independent >>>>>>>> of any >>>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have >>>> a >>>>>>> slight >>>>>>>>> preference >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex >>>>> working, >>>>>>>> but if >>>>>>>>> I'm not >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> RM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the >>>>>> merge >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was >>>>> also >>>>>>>>> pondering just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins >>>>> to >>>>>>>> "master" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this >>>> fixes >>>>>>>> issue with >>>>>>>>>> build. - >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build >>>> for >>>>>>>> module >>>>>>>>> Icons. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr >>>>>> Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to >>>>>>>> build.xml, if >>>>>>>>> it won't >>>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr >>>>> Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing >>>> build >>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>> complaining >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs >>>>> does >>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> exist" and >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is >>>>>> being >>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>> to that >>>>>>>>>>>>> folder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files >>>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr >>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about >>>>> problem >>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> build on >>>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will >>>>>>> attach >>>>>>>> dev >>>>>>>>> list and >>>>>>>>>>>>> write >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto: >>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos >>>>> Rovira < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, >>>>>> but I >>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for >>>>> releases >>>>>>>> "post >>>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In >>>>>>>>>>>>> fact I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the >>>>> only >>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>> that was >>>>>>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>>>>>>> us not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this >>>>> point >>>>>>>> safe to >>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days >>>> wanting >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> finish >>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an >>>>> stable >>>>>>>> way, for >>>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> points are: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List >>>>> remove >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> update data >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I >>>> think >>>>>>> those >>>>>>>> three >>>>>>>>> points >>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start >>>>>> working >>>>>>>> in real >>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a >>>>>> real >>>>>>>> project >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to >>>>> complete >>>>>>>> these >>>>>>>>> points). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope >>>>>>>> something of >>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, >>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>>>> (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The >>>>>>> question >>>>>>>>> whether >>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe >>>> big >>>>>>> part >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>> process >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash >>>>>>>> Muppirala < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already >>>> pushed >>>>>> out >>>>>>>> via >>>>>>>>> npm [1], >>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM >>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last >>>>> version >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> Royale was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing >>>>>> current >>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>>> matter >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have >>>>>>> probably >>>>>>>>> unfinished >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting >>>> leave >>>>>> it >>>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will >>>>> study >>>>>>>> carefully >>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the >>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing >>>>> typedefs >>>>>> - >>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>> cleaned up >>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask >>>>> infra >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> advice. [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in >>>> case >>>>>> of >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>> Royale >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up >>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - >>>> Can >>>>> I >>>>>>>> merge it >>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>> develop ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold >>>>> that >>>>>>>> release ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>* >> >
