It sounds like I have still not clearly explained how
library-path/swf-library-path/js-library-path work.
Library-path is for SWCs that "might" work for both SWF and JS. When we
compile most Royale SWCs, we build the library.swf with COMPILE::SWF=true and
then compile JS files with COMPILE::SWF=false. The gamble is that folks will
not use platform-specific APIs (like Flash classes or the Browser's
HTMLElement. The default configuration for Royale is to put the SWCs in
frameworks/projects on the library-path.
The swf-library-path and js-library-path options are for specifying SWCs that
have APIs for that specific platform. BUT (this is the key point), as soon as
you specify even one SWC with js-library-path, the compiler will no longer us
just plain -library-path in determining the list of SWCs. If one SWC was
specified with -js-library-path, then ALL swcs for the JS compile must be
specified using js-library-path.
So, if you used -js-library-path to specify your custom SWC, then you should
get the error about not finding Application since it was specified with just
plain "library-path" in royale-config.xml. You might have to specify
-js-library-path=<royale-asjs folder>/frameworks/js/libs" as well to get all of
the other Royale SWCs.
Anyone who can explain it better, please do so.
HTH,
-Alex
On 9/11/18, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
I just checked and here is the results.
JS version of library:
If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being
recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale)
If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with
errors described in first email.
SWF version of library:
If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1], however
if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce correct
swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path.
If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to produce
correct swf.
It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now. Very
useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is all
bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path.
Many Thanks for help Alex.
[1]
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F13Sq&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=8j7p5BEsuPo0%2BDJswEDKd9sTYqnoTSMJ1Udecu6FSbY%3D&reserved=0
wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):
> Alex,
>
> It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required information and
> files. I have in this library two files.
>
> 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes
> 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and COMPILE::JS
>
> JS library dump:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FdLA2&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=4TVP%2BBe2XjGHgTasVjcizK7z3MGC7fBsnUyNYHzi77E%3D&reserved=0
> SWF library dump:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fo1rW&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=lyRLg0ahC%2Fqthf49onOBKZmL6LHgaT0uKnhwV%2Fie%2Bw0%3D&reserved=0
>
> Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it makes
> any difference.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same.
>>
>> JS ->
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FXhLi&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=a1qu6RWSm%2BNUOMday9oEoN7SBFBEfv%2FLNdBHUt9TCAM%3D&reserved=0
>> SWF ->
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FMwKB&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=BSON%2B6%2Bqip94VGBFht19rWvmndAPqbcXNHbmSNq%2BCG8%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF
>>> only.
>>>
>>> Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml? It is
>>> easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC. It could be that the
manifest
>>> or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz" <pio...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is
>>> inside
>>> both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version.
>>>
>>> <
>>>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1%2Fjs_swf.png&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=D5dO%2FOTk1yi%2BiApjj9VJcRwLe%2Bao%2Bmkm34VH9w4egrA%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files.
>>>
>>> I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is
>>> working
>>> fine.
>>>
>>> I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from:
>>>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=zpptYPxUJ9%2FCZOgcNj0Sas2tEDdAHKxZf8WLih061AM%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon:
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337093590&sdata=jhRo4WPayo2TP7D82u9dl3m33YjJJxEKTCqMEWSXtAc%3D&reserved=0
>>
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337103595&sdata=vVF0GhS%2BX0S%2FK1gbKHSQzQuVD40jugxU3Sh3kRoNTP0%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon:
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337103595&sdata=vVF0GhS%2BX0S%2FK1gbKHSQzQuVD40jugxU3Sh3kRoNTP0%3D&reserved=0
>
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337103595&sdata=vVF0GhS%2BX0S%2FK1gbKHSQzQuVD40jugxU3Sh3kRoNTP0%3D&reserved=0>*
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon:
*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337103595&sdata=vVF0GhS%2BX0S%2FK1gbKHSQzQuVD40jugxU3Sh3kRoNTP0%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4ee5a0296b76446e222308d61803a8fc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722801337103595&sdata=vVF0GhS%2BX0S%2FK1gbKHSQzQuVD40jugxU3Sh3kRoNTP0%3D&reserved=0>*
