I just checked and here is the results. JS version of library: If I'm using js-external-library-path or js-library-path - SWC is being recognized and I'm able to build using it my project to JS (JSRoyale) If I'm using -library-path or external-library-path - It's failing with errors described in first email.
SWF version of library: If I'm using -swf-library-path - I'm getting following error [1], however if I use -swf-external-library-path - project is able to produce correct swf. Maybe we have a bug in case of -swf-library-path. If I'm using -library-path and external-library-path I'm able to produce correct swf. It looks like I know how to implement all of that in Moonshine now. Very useful information. I'm wondering whether we shouldn't think that is all bugs in case of -library-path and swf-library-path. Many Thanks for help Alex. [1] https://paste.apache.org/13Sq wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:09 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > Alex, > > It looks like library.swf contains in both cases required information and > files. I have in this library two files. > > 1) MyClass -> Contains import of all classes > 2) MyViewClass - contains function in blocs COMPILE::SWF and COMPILE::JS > > JS library dump: https://paste.apache.org/dLA2 > SWF library dump: https://paste.apache.org/o1rW > > Next step is to try using -js-library-path etc to check whether it makes > any difference. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 18:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > >> Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same. >> >> JS -> https://paste.apache.org/XhLi >> SWF -> https://paste.apache.org/MwKB >> >> I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump. >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> napisał(a): >> >>> Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF >>> only. >>> >>> Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml? It is >>> easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC. It could be that the manifest >>> or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile. >>> >>> HTH, >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz" <pio...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is >>> inside >>> both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version. >>> >>> < >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1%2Fjs_swf.png&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370&sdata=P6cfNMW8dyfFqNHlIrvlpLYbRdDsK5KLzz7QuLADZKQ%3D&reserved=0> >>> >>> >>> Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files. >>> >>> I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is >>> working >>> fine. >>> >>> I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370&sdata=mx1qBKZd81wM0BuMJgh7dWAr3dc%2FdGQLuKHphalMqRo%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
