Yes I did it. Both looks almost the same. JS -> https://paste.apache.org/XhLi SWF -> https://paste.apache.org/MwKB
I will provide in couple of minutes SWF dump. Thanks, Piotr wt., 11 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> napisał(a): > Royale SWCs should always have a folder of JS files unless they are SWF > only. > > Before you dump the library.swf, did you look in the catalog.xml? It is > easier to see what it thinks is in the SWC. It could be that the manifest > or other list of classes is not specified in the JS compile. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 9/11/18, 8:49 AM, "piotrz" <pio...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > The first part of your answer is behind me. I have checked what is > inside > both swcs. On the left sight of the screenshot is JS version. > > < > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1%2Fjs_swf.png&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370&sdata=P6cfNMW8dyfFqNHlIrvlpLYbRdDsK5KLzz7QuLADZKQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > Interesting thing is that in both cases I have folder with JS files. > > I have definitely my swcs in library-path, because SWF version is > working > fine. > > I will try to examine library.swf and get back to you. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > > -- > Sent from: > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C433e8a0206c14a29f6de08d617fe3860%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722777968242370&sdata=mx1qBKZd81wM0BuMJgh7dWAr3dc%2FdGQLuKHphalMqRo%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
