Hi Alina, trying to open .rar file gives me "Invalid Format"
El mié., 17 oct. 2018 a las 12:27, Alina Kazi (<alina.k...@d-bz.com>) escribió: > Hi Alex, > > We were using Flash Builder IDE as Tool for Flex Application Development. > .actionScriptProperties file was like: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/kjhlcw1f8vcm8z8/.actionScriptProperties?dl=0 > > controls, utils and components were compiled automatically without adding > them anywhere in the properties file. > Yes, some files were in our Library Project SHMALib and SHMALib.swc is > added to Main Project Library Path . > > Now, we are trying to compile our Application using Ant . Few Changes are > made in Build.xml after reading your last reply carefully. > Some files are compiled through adding compc in Build.xml and different > libraries are created successfully. > > I think the compilation order matters in Apache Royale (Ant Build) but it > was not in Flex. Correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks for the Help, > Alina Kazi > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:33 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere. > > How has your company built the Flex app over the past years? Is it all > from an IDE or do you have some sort of script or build tool? > > Whatever you are using to build the Flex app should be translated to the > Ant script. What is currently in the Ant script you copied from > tourdeflexmodules is custom designed for tourdeflexmodules. It presumes > lots of little applications that don't use custom libraries. > > The mxmlc task in Ant is just like running mxml from the command line or > having an Application project in an IDE. > The compc task in Ant is just like running compc from the command line or > having a Library project in an IDE. > > You can see from the build.xml files in the royale-asjs repo that we build > SWCs by having a build.xml in each library folder and calling them from a > build.xml in a parent folder. You might find that pattern useful. > > You will need to understand the -source-path and -library-path and > -external-library-path and other compiler options that were used to build > the Flex app and copy probably all of those options into the right place in > the Ant scripts. > > It would be uncommon to compile a file called shmUtil with mxmlc. shmUtil > sounds like a file in a library, not a standalone application. I'll bet it > comes from a library that should be compiled with compc along with a lot of > other files. > > If you are having trouble with Ant, also try the command-line, then others > may be able to help you see the differences between your Ant script and > what worked on the command-line. If you use an IDE to build the Flex app, > you will need to find out all of the compiler options the IDE sets up for > you. I think others can help you with that as well. > > -Alex > > On 10/16/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Created a mxmlc task directly in build.xml still an error is occured : > Added to Build.xml : > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647920350&sdata=n9VV85yDI3a8PkJBQk09LX4gF24o%2FiBOHgms5UDEoYE%3D&reserved=0 > Error : > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647920350&sdata=VDngOh9M2cVLANBNxUhZKA8dEODuWHP2SH7nY4jhjVw%3D&reserved=0 > > Thanks, > Alina Kazi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:46 AM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alina, > > The example in examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest is working and > accesses the server that is in examples/amf/ SampleAmfWebApp. > Theoretically, your old mx:RemoteObject code should work untouched. Try it > without touching it and tell us what kinds of errors you are getting. If > you are getting runtime errors, see how the RemoteObjectAMFTest uses > "casting" to be explicit about the types of the RemoteObject expressions. > You'll see "as Operation" to indicate that an mx:method in an > mx:RemoteObject is an Operation. > > The compile-mxml macro is in the build.xml file. It has certain > expectations of the structure of the source files. Your source files are > likely have a different folder structure. You will need to add > source-paths and other compiler options to the macro, or stop using the > macro and call the mxmlc ant task directly. That is up to you. This is a > good opportunity to get to know Ant and the compiler better. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 10/15/18, 11:07 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex & Carlos, > I haven't tested my ported Application with server side > functionality yet. > Can you please share an Example that I can follow to get my > mx:RemoteObject working as FLEX. > > I have another question > > I am working on my Application and it has two different > directories like com->shm->modules->AP and com->shm->modules->components > and I want to compile a file inside com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and it > uses a file inside com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml. > I have added <compile-mxml folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/" > example=" abc"/> to build.xml. > unable to access xyz inside abc. > > Like > D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\ > VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using VideoPlayer.mxml in my case > VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same directory. > > Thanks, > Alina Kazi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:26 AM > To: dev@royale.apache.org > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run > > Hi Alex, > > yes, I added those classes when worked trying to make it work in > net RO, but I found a wall at that time. I think DSK objects had a > different code when deserialized, and our AMF implementation was not able > to handle that. > I was not able to know how to deal with that so I had to abandon. > At least I could pass that disabling small messages on BlazeDS. > > I don't think Small Messages are very important, don't know how > "small" > will be, so I think we can go to other things more important. If I > found some problem as I start to grow my application that could be related > to small messages I'll report. Hope not find any issue > > The only drawback could be people coming that must know they need > to disable small messages on their BlazeDS. > > I think it will be more important later since IExternalizable in > itself seems an important addition. > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 20:21, Alex Harui > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > escribió: > > > The classes that represent DSK, DSA and DSC are in the MXRoyale > and > > Network projects, but it looks like they implement > IExternalizable. I > > don't see any evidence that the JS AMF support currently handles > > IExternalizable. > > > > I'm not clear on how important SmallMessages and IExternalizable > are. > > If it isn't that important, there are plenty of other things to > work > > on. If it is important, do we have a test case that uses > IExternalizable? > > > > -Alex > > > > On 10/15/18, 10:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Yes, > > > > I tried today (with code pre-callProperty, that I think does > not make > > difference for this). > > There's small message support in RPC classes, but when I > looked at that > > code when I investigate it, I think must be accompanied from > some AMF > > serialization/deserialization support. I couldn't find any > resources on > > this in the internet about how to handle DSK, DSA or DSC. > Maybe > > you can ask > > internally in Adobe how to deal with that. My guess is that > this > > was added > > to Flash plugin AMF serialization capabilities. > > > > > > > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 19:03, Alex Harui > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > > escribió: > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > Have you verified that small messages do not work with the > MX > > > RemoteObject? I thought I saw Small Message support when > I was > > migrating > > > the code. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 10:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira" < > carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > just for if you don't know. If you use BlazeDS Java > server, > > remember > > > to set > > > up small messages to false, or you RemoteObjects will > not work. > > To get > > > small messages we'll need to upgrade AMF > > serialization-deserialization > > > to > > > know how to handle DSK, DSA, and DSC RemoteClass > aliases. > > > > > > Best > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 18:39, Alex Harui > > > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Good to know. You (and anybody working with the > emulation > > > components) are > > > > expected to keep track of the commits to the > royale-compiler > > as well > > > as the > > > > royale-asjs repos and stay updated. We are still > finding bugs > > in the > > > > transpiling that may affect you. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi" < > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot it worked for me. > > > > > > > > -Alina kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 2:07 PM > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To > Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Are you sure you are using the latest compiler? > Try > > compiling > > > > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It compiles > without > > errors > > > for me. > > > > > > > > I have to stop for tonight. Hopefully others > will help > > you. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 1:37 AM, "Alina Kazi" < > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > We are using MX Remote Object in almost our > every > > Class like > > > this: > > > > <mx:RemoteObject > > > channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}" > > > > id="DataProviderService" showBusyCursor="true" > > > > > > > > destination="shmBasic" fault="handleFault(event);" > > > > > > > > result="handleResult(event);" /> > > > > We get error ASBlocker subsystem. > > > > When we comment RemoteObject we need to > comment methods > > > those are > > > > using it. > > > > > > > > I agree with that if I will delete some code > for > > compilation > > > I > > > > will face other issues at later stage. > > > > > > > > Can I replace mx:remoteObject with : > > > > <s:RemoteObject id="ro" endpoint=" > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647920350&sdata=gGPIiogE8p1OG%2FxgV9QYICFCJmDv4rKnkvPMc3L5exM%3D&reserved=0 > > > " > > > > destination="census"/> > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 1:16 PM > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component > To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > I recommend just running the compiled > application and > > fixing > > > > problems as you run into them. > > > > > > > > If you start copying code and deleting other > code, you > > cannot > > > > guarantee that the results will run. I'm not even > sure > > TitleWindow > > > is a > > > > valid child control of an Application. Usually it > is a popup > > dialog. > > > > > > > > When you run the application, you will > probably find > > > exceptions in > > > > the console. Set a breakpoint, see if you can > figure out why > > it is > > > > generating an exception. Change the code as needed. > > > > > > > > If you aren’t getting exceptions, then look > at the > > element > > > tree. > > > > Either all of the expected elements have been > created or not. > > If > > > not, then > > > > look at the innermost element to see what it is. In > the > > properties > > > for the > > > > element is a royale_wrapper property that points to > the > > transpiled > > > AS3 > > > > class. That can help you know what class didn't > create its > > children. > > > > Check the _beads array of that class to see if it > created its > > beads > > > or > > > > not. If not, check the CSS for that element, or > debug into > > its code. > > > > Usually, addedToParent is where the view bead is > added. > > > > > > > > If the elements have been created, check the > sizes. > > Often > > > some of > > > > them will have width or height = 0. Try to figure > why it is > > getting > > > a bad > > > > size. > > > > > > > > If you take this approach, then if you get > stuck you > > can ask > > > a > > > > much more specific question and we can give you more > specific > > > answers. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, our days only overlap by a > few hours, > > but I > > > hope > > > > other committers can help as well. It is in their > best > > interest to > > > improve > > > > their help and debugging skills. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/15/18, 12:59 AM, "Alina Kazi" < > > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > As our whole application is compiled > successfully > > without > > > > error as a part of SparkRoyale Library. > > > > > > > > Now, We have created a project like > > tourdeflexmodules to > > > > compile and visually see the application output. > > > > Initially started with the basic(small) > file of our > > > > application that is used by most of the files of our > > Application. > > > > > > > > We have a file in our application > "Picklist.mxml" > > > > It was actually like : > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647930363&sdata=qZS2jISCRHOB7mF5ocoMUCIJyngVX7QVw%2Frc1%2FZMl08%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > we want to see it visually as all our mx > and spark > > > controls > > > > are already added in Apache Royale. > > > > Deleted whole code accept visual > controls from src > > file : > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647930363&sdata=tqeP5DRke%2BgsZActpH5SxhNREz6Yg6b7BCC30Cy2Y%2FU%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Nothing shows inside spark > BorderContainer & > > TitleWindow. > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647930363&sdata=coDWAIfV6L2SgkKww%2BCupaqUAR0dz2nl0BpIvwJEaIc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > How can we see all visual controls as > they were in > > Flex > > > of > > > > this particular file. > > > > Even spark BorderContainer default.css > is copied > > from > > > Flex > > > > ->Royale. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 11:15 AM > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation > Component To Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Different APIs will have different > solutions. > > Pick an > > > API you > > > > want to have work and let's discuss how to make it > work. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/14/18, 10:48 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > alina.k...@d-bz.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > All mx and spark class methods those > were left > > empty > > > for > > > > the compilation of Application. > > > > Also Module does not show anything > on screen. > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > Alina > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID] > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 > 12:32 PM > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation > Component To > > Run > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > Which components or properties are > you trying > > to get > > > to > > > > run? > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 10/10/18, 10:40 PM, "Alina Kazi" < > > > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if CSS for a component is > not written > > in > > > Basic / > > > > Express defaults.css? > > > > > > > > And We need it in MXRoyale / > SparkRoyale > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alex Harui [mailto: > aha...@adobe.com] > > > > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 > 8:40 PM > > > > To: Alina Kazi > > > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation > > Component To > > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alina, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please ask these questions on > dev@ as > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CSS with ClassReference is a way > to use > > > Composition to > > > > customize components. Copying code is usually a > bad practice > > as it > > > > creates maintenance issues. So, in general, the > preference > > should > > > be to > > > > use CSS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Alina Kazi < > alina.k...@d-bz.com> > > > > Date: Monday, October 8, 2018 at > 2:02 AM > > > > To: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com > > > > > > Subject: Getting An Emulation > Component To > > Run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > We want to know how can we > identify which > > is the > > > right > > > > stub? > > > > > > > > For Example: selected property > written > > > differently in > > > > CheckBox, RadioButton and > > > > > > > > we want selected property for > Button. How > > can we > > > > identify and pick the right code for Button? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. copying the little bits > of code > > from the > > > > Basic or Express version into the right stub in the > Emulation > > > Component > > > > > > > > 2. copying the CSS from > Basic or > > Express > > > > defaults.css into the MXRoyale or SparkRoyale > defaults.css > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > > > > > > Alina Kazi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647930363&sdata=DKxzu6A3SgZavO4NUp%2F%2Bj8bsBMlJdNdjNXsPLVvghgk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout. > > me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7C04eb29f37fce > > > 40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367 > > > 52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU > > %3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd7527a4c73784814602308d633483ad2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636752782647930363&sdata=DKxzu6A3SgZavO4NUp%2F%2Bj8bsBMlJdNdjNXsPLVvghgk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
