Hi Alex,
This time I told you about folders hierarchy its same as
examples/royale/ModuleExample.
js:UIModuleLoader is replaced with mx:ModuleLoader url property is added in
ModuleLoader and extra properties are removed, js:UIModule is replaced with
mx:Module
js:Application is replaced with mx:Application
namespace is replaced with mx namespace
Console output stopped at :
[mxmlc] 109142 bytes written to
D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\royale\ModuleExample\Module\bin-debug\Module.swf
in 3.220 seconds
How else I can explain it in a better way.
Simply I just want same working like examples/royale/ModuleExample with Mx
Controls.
I am not using TitleWindow in my current example.
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:40 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
Again, half a world away, I cannot know what your folder structure and build
files look like, or what you tried or didn't try. And now, I have to stop
working and we missed an opportunity to help you because the important
information was not provided in your earlier email. I wrote some techniques in
this email:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6f3aa4010dca8c9bdbe2828a89295039d05d23806a5fe03ae18dbe4@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E
In your next email, I expect you see evidence that you have understood and
tried the techniques in the email I linked. You will be expected to provide
console output or information about the tree of elements. And this might be a
good opportunity for you to try the debugger and set breakpoints in various
places. Even if you don't actually solve the problem you are facing, you are
going to have to become an expert in debugging JavaScript output from the
Royale Compiler.
Please reserve the time to write a really good email with the important
information and questions. It will save all of us time.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/21/18, 11:39 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
Hi Alina,
The key piece for modules is getting the output in the right place.
Flex/Flash has some interesting rules around how URLs got loaded. I haven't
found a practical way to replicate that in the Browser, so for now, it is up to
you to put the output where you are telling ModuleLoader to load it.
If you look at the Ant build.xml for royale/ModuleExample, the
Module/build.xml assumes the MainApp has been built first and copies its output
files into the MainApp's output folders.
If you look at the build.xml for mxroyale/touredeflexexamples, it uses the
-module-output compiler option to redirect the output.
If you look in the Browser console, I expect you will see errors that it
couldn’t find a particular JS file for the module. Pay attention to the
folders and adjust your build script to place the output in the right place (or
adjust where you tell ModuleLoader to find the module.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/21/18, 11:22 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Created an example contains two files :
1. Module.mxml
<mx:Module
xmlns:fx="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=7%2F%2BLRzhliEI%2FXdCs%2BE5wSvaLe8pOwD%2FZYsEtyZJCo18%3D&reserved=0";
xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx">
<mx:Label text="This Label is in the module" />
<mx:TextInput id="ti" text="This TextInput is also in the module" />
</mx:Module>
2. MainApp.mxml
<mx:Application
xmlns:fx="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.adobe.com%2Fmxml%2F2009&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=7%2F%2BLRzhliEI%2FXdCs%2BE5wSvaLe8pOwD%2FZYsEtyZJCo18%3D&reserved=0";
xmlns:mx="library://ns.apache.org/royale/mx" >
<mx:Button label="Btn in Application" />
<mx:ModuleLoader id = "ml1" x="30" y="30" url = "Module.swf" />
</mx:Application>
No visual output shown . I want it to work like
examples\royale\ModuleExample
Thanks in Advance ,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 9:33 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere.
How has your company built the Flex app over the past years? Is it all
from an IDE or do you have some sort of script or build tool?
Whatever you are using to build the Flex app should be translated to
the Ant script. What is currently in the Ant script you copied from
tourdeflexmodules is custom designed for tourdeflexmodules. It presumes lots
of little applications that don't use custom libraries.
The mxmlc task in Ant is just like running mxml from the command line
or having an Application project in an IDE.
The compc task in Ant is just like running compc from the command line
or having a Library project in an IDE.
You can see from the build.xml files in the royale-asjs repo that we
build SWCs by having a build.xml in each library folder and calling them from a
build.xml in a parent folder. You might find that pattern useful.
You will need to understand the -source-path and -library-path and
-external-library-path and other compiler options that were used to build the
Flex app and copy probably all of those options into the right place in the Ant
scripts.
It would be uncommon to compile a file called shmUtil with mxmlc.
shmUtil sounds like a file in a library, not a standalone application. I'll
bet it comes from a library that should be compiled with compc along with a lot
of other files.
If you are having trouble with Ant, also try the command-line, then
others may be able to help you see the differences between your Ant script and
what worked on the command-line. If you use an IDE to build the Flex app, you
will need to find out all of the compiler options the IDE sets up for you. I
think others can help you with that as well.
-Alex
On 10/16/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Created a mxmlc task directly in build.xml still an error is
occured :
Added to Build.xml :
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FwBDm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=Qmrwbhbn79h5qoE09j0FbrzXjeuGs78jrGt6CMUCdM0%3D&reserved=0
Error :
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOXFT&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=uhUsaubD7q90TlJgjvfGhAWnQmmRzwK22lxIS39c3s0%3D&reserved=0
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:46 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alina,
The example in examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest is working and
accesses the server that is in examples/amf/ SampleAmfWebApp. Theoretically,
your old mx:RemoteObject code should work untouched. Try it without touching
it and tell us what kinds of errors you are getting. If you are getting
runtime errors, see how the RemoteObjectAMFTest uses "casting" to be explicit
about the types of the RemoteObject expressions. You'll see "as Operation" to
indicate that an mx:method in an mx:RemoteObject is an Operation.
The compile-mxml macro is in the build.xml file. It has certain
expectations of the structure of the source files. Your source files are
likely have a different folder structure. You will need to add source-paths
and other compiler options to the macro, or stop using the macro and call the
mxmlc ant task directly. That is up to you. This is a good opportunity to get
to know Ant and the compiler better.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/15/18, 11:07 PM, "Alina Kazi" <alina.k...@d-bz.com> wrote:
Hi Alex & Carlos,
I haven't tested my ported Application with server side
functionality yet.
Can you please share an Example that I can follow to get my
mx:RemoteObject working as FLEX.
I have another question
I am working on my Application and it has two different
directories like com->shm->modules->AP and com->shm->modules->components and I
want to compile a file inside com->shm->modules->AP->abc.mxml and it uses a
file inside com->shm->modules->components->xyz.mxml.
I have added <compile-mxml folder="/com/shm/modules/AP/"
example=" abc"/> to build.xml.
unable to access xyz inside abc.
Like
D:\apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js-swf\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale\tourdeflexmodules\src\spark\components\
VideoPlayerExample.mxml is using VideoPlayer.mxml in my case
VideoPlayer.mxml is not is the same directory.
Thanks,
Alina Kazi
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:26 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component To Run
Hi Alex,
yes, I added those classes when worked trying to make it work
in net RO, but I found a wall at that time. I think DSK objects had a different
code when deserialized, and our AMF implementation was not able to handle that.
I was not able to know how to deal with that so I had to
abandon. At least I could pass that disabling small messages on BlazeDS.
I don't think Small Messages are very important, don't know how
"small"
will be, so I think we can go to other things more important.
If I found some problem as I start to grow my application that could be related
to small messages I'll report. Hope not find any issue
The only drawback could be people coming that must know they
need to disable small messages on their BlazeDS.
I think it will be more important later since IExternalizable
in itself seems an important addition.
Thanks
Carlos
El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 20:21, Alex Harui
(<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
escribió:
> The classes that represent DSK, DSA and DSC are in the
MXRoyale and
> Network projects, but it looks like they implement
IExternalizable. I
> don't see any evidence that the JS AMF support currently
handles
> IExternalizable.
>
> I'm not clear on how important SmallMessages and
IExternalizable are.
> If it isn't that important, there are plenty of other things
to work
> on. If it is important, do we have a test case that uses
IExternalizable?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/15/18, 10:55 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
<carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> I tried today (with code pre-callProperty, that I think
does not make
> difference for this).
> There's small message support in RPC classes, but when I
looked at that
> code when I investigate it, I think must be accompanied
from some AMF
> serialization/deserialization support. I couldn't find
any resources on
> this in the internet about how to handle DSK, DSA or DSC.
Maybe
> you can ask
> internally in Adobe how to deal with that. My guess is
that this
> was added
> to Flash plugin AMF serialization capabilities.
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 19:03, Alex Harui
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > Have you verified that small messages do not work with
the MX
> > RemoteObject? I thought I saw Small Message support
when I was
> migrating
> > the code.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 10/15/18, 10:01 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
<carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alina,
> >
> > just for if you don't know. If you use BlazeDS Java
server,
> remember
> > to set
> > up small messages to false, or you RemoteObjects
will not work.
> To get
> > small messages we'll need to upgrade AMF
> serialization-deserialization
> > to
> > know how to handle DSK, DSA, and DSC RemoteClass
aliases.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> > El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 18:39, Alex Harui
> > (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Good to know. You (and anybody working with the
emulation
> > components) are
> > > expected to keep track of the commits to the
royale-compiler
> as well
> > as the
> > > royale-asjs repos and stay updated. We are still
finding bugs
> in the
> > > transpiling that may affect you.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 2:17 AM, "Alina Kazi"
<alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot it worked for me.
> > >
> > > -Alina kazi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 2:07 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation Component
To Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Are you sure you are using the latest
compiler? Try
> compiling
> > > examples/mxroyale/RemoteObjectAMFTest. It
compiles without
> errors
> > for me.
> > >
> > > I have to stop for tonight. Hopefully others
will help
> you.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 1:37 AM, "Alina Kazi"
<alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > We are using MX Remote Object in almost
our every
> Class like
> > this:
> > > <mx:RemoteObject
> > channelSet="{parentApplication.amfChannelSet}"
> > > id="DataProviderService" showBusyCursor="true"
> > >
> > > destination="shmBasic"
fault="handleFault(event);"
> > >
> > > result="handleResult(event);" />
> > > We get error ASBlocker subsystem.
> > > When we comment RemoteObject we need to
comment methods
> > those are
> > > using it.
> > >
> > > I agree with that if I will delete some
code for
> compilation
> > I
> > > will face other issues at later stage.
> > >
> > > Can I replace mx:remoteObject with :
> > > <s:RemoteObject id="ro" endpoint="
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamesward.com%2Fcensus2-tests%2Fmessagebroker%2Famf&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=FgoXihfoU9vo9ec0Jp%2Byo6S5lgbobAPIcdNclqjneZE%3D&reserved=0
> > "
> > > destination="census"/>
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance,
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 1:16 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
Component To Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > I recommend just running the compiled
application and
> fixing
> > > problems as you run into them.
> > >
> > > If you start copying code and deleting
other code, you
> cannot
> > > guarantee that the results will run. I'm not
even sure
> TitleWindow
> > is a
> > > valid child control of an Application. Usually
it is a popup
> dialog.
> > >
> > > When you run the application, you will
probably find
> > exceptions in
> > > the console. Set a breakpoint, see if you can
figure out why
> it is
> > > generating an exception. Change the code as
needed.
> > >
> > > If you aren’t getting exceptions, then
look at the
> element
> > tree.
> > > Either all of the expected elements have been
created or not.
> If
> > not, then
> > > look at the innermost element to see what it is.
In the
> properties
> > for the
> > > element is a royale_wrapper property that points
to the
> transpiled
> > AS3
> > > class. That can help you know what class didn't
create its
> children.
> > > Check the _beads array of that class to see if it
created its
> beads
> > or
> > > not. If not, check the CSS for that element, or
debug into
> its code.
> > > Usually, addedToParent is where the view bead is
added.
> > >
> > > If the elements have been created, check
the sizes.
> Often
> > some of
> > > them will have width or height = 0. Try to
figure why it is
> getting
> > a bad
> > > size.
> > >
> > > If you take this approach, then if you
get stuck you
> can ask
> > a
> > > much more specific question and we can give you
more specific
> > answers.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, our days only overlap by a
few hours,
> but I
> > hope
> > > other committers can help as well. It is in
their best
> interest to
> > improve
> > > their help and debugging skills.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/15/18, 12:59 AM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > As our whole application is compiled
successfully
> without
> > > error as a part of SparkRoyale Library.
> > >
> > > Now, We have created a project like
> tourdeflexmodules to
> > > compile and visually see the application output.
> > > Initially started with the
basic(small) file of our
> > > application that is used by most of the files of
our
> Application.
> > >
> > > We have a file in our application
"Picklist.mxml"
> > > It was actually like :
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FRVtj&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=M1vJXGgZpGFlynONhui82NJ6RXeGnpzCSTKaK2H7EcM%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > we want to see it visually as all our
mx and spark
> > controls
> > > are already added in Apache Royale.
> > > Deleted whole code accept visual
controls from src
> file :
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FH4Sm&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=8zCA71aK5lBMT%2F4g%2FbxYY%2BLygjNSaj8NhItOn3iIW6U%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Nothing shows inside spark
BorderContainer &
> TitleWindow.
> > > [3]
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FEpS8&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=CTvaP6Nhws7sV%2BGydJndTQyloM9ir3Wgct1L329iwL4%3D&reserved=0
> > > How can we see all visual controls as
they were in
> Flex
> > of
> > > this particular file.
> > > Even spark BorderContainer
default.css is copied
> from
> > Flex
> > > ->Royale.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 11:15
AM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
Component To Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Different APIs will have different
solutions.
> Pick an
> > API you
> > > want to have work and let's discuss how to make
it work.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/14/18, 10:48 PM, "Alina Kazi" <
> alina.k...@d-bz.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > All mx and spark class methods
those were left
> empty
> > for
> > > the compilation of Application.
> > > Also Module does not show
anything on screen.
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance,
> > > Alina
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:
> aha...@adobe.com.INVALID]
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018
12:32 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An Emulation
Component To
> Run
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > > Which components or properties
are you trying
> to get
> > to
> > > run?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/10/18, 10:40 PM, "Alina
Kazi" <
> > alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What if CSS for a component
is not written
> in
> > Basic /
> > > Express defaults.css?
> > >
> > > And We need it in MXRoyale /
SparkRoyale
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Alex Harui
[mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 08,
2018 8:40 PM
> > > To: Alina Kazi
> > > Subject: Re: Getting An
Emulation
> Component To
> > Run
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Alina,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please ask these questions on
dev@ as
> well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CSS with ClassReference is a
way to use
> > Composition to
> > > customize components. Copying code is usually a
bad practice
> as it
> > > creates maintenance issues. So, in general, the
preference
> should
> > be to
> > > use CSS.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Alina Kazi
<alina.k...@d-bz.com>
> > > Date: Monday, October 8, 2018
at 2:02 AM
> > > To: Alex Harui
<aha...@adobe.com>
> > > Subject: Getting An Emulation
Component To
> Run
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > We want to know how can we
identify which
> is the
> > right
> > > stub?
> > >
> > > For Example: selected
property written
> > differently in
> > > CheckBox, RadioButton and
> > >
> > > we want selected property for
Button. How
> can we
> > > identify and pick the right code for Button?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. copying the little
bits of code
> from the
> > > Basic or Express version into the right stub in
the Emulation
> > Component
> > >
> > > 2. copying the CSS from
Basic or
> Express
> > > defaults.css into the MXRoyale or SparkRoyale
defaults.css
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance,
> > >
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=n8ydpah%2BbPjcz6qNMDKtdOilJNWPK2aMGZsOy6d2pwM%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.
>
me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C04eb29f37fce
>
40d3df9908d632c77330%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6367
>
52229546474497&sdata=7S2M%2BRlyCsWd2pShdvTsjfyJp9xyZ5bdaAc3zZQrilU
> %3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C6c1368f15d264177995708d637e6cc63%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636757861745966789&sdata=n8ydpah%2BbPjcz6qNMDKtdOilJNWPK2aMGZsOy6d2pwM%3D&reserved=0
