I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts on Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow consistent. ;)
pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an adventure. Options > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just plain "royale". It > is telling that none of these tags currently exist. > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations started, maybe: > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an enterprise-level > Flex app? > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note that > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment] > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an option? > Other leading questions? > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course getting juice into > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers toward Royale) > depends on those who have already found Royale providing answers. > > a > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just create my account > > now, so I'm learning too. > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to measure tech impact > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how easy is to find > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how something is done > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and normally for > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses. > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some common > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't know, but there > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag for all the > > question related to us. > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to starting this if he > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it and starting > some > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us entering SO world.. > > > > > > > > > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do you mean ? I'm > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does presence of Royale > can > >> be printed there ? > >> > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >> > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have time to answer > >> SO > >> > questions. > >> > > >> > Harbs > >> > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on > Stackoverflow. > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and increasing presence > >> over > >> > > time should be a key goal for us. > >> > > What do you think? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Carlos Rovira > >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
