More about good vs bad questions here [1]

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask

El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 19:50, Carlos Rovira (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> Hi Josh,
>
> thanks for pointing about how to do answers. As I signed in SO site, I saw
> some indications about be very explicit and avoid questions that could be
> "interpreted", So questions like you proposed seems perfect.
>
> About availability for all people here: IMHO we should all try to setup
> and account there and help as we can. That doesn't mean necessarily to move
> from this list to SO. Just to be aware and in the same way we help here,
> try to help there. And if any of you here spend 20' here spend only that
> time (and only that) here or there. I think we all here want Royale to
> succeed. I think this is a key point since people is in SO, and I'm sure
> this is an opportunity to make Apache Royale better known to people that in
> other circumstances could never know about it.
>
> As all vote for "apacheroyale", it's ok for me too.
>
> Thanks! :)
>
>
> El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 18:54, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
>
>> Those who want to help create a presence for Royale on SO are certainly
>> welcome and have my thanks for doing so.
>>
>> I think an "apacheroyale" tag is best.
>>
>> I would not recommend making SO our main user support channel at this
>> time.  Some ASF projects do, but we already have users@ and also I think
>> myself and others are unable to help on SO.  I've had trouble getting
>> established on SO in the past.  In fact, I just tried logging in there
>> again and I think they erased my account so I had to sign up again.
>>
>> I'll keep trying if I have a few moments here and there, but for now I'll
>> mainly help on the mailing lists.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 3/4/19, 8:42 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     Another one:
>>
>>     Question: Why isn't JSON working in my Royale app?
>>     Answer: Either use variable["property"] syntax or enable the
>> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true compiler option.
>>
>>     - Josh
>>
>>     On 2019/03/04 16:41:03, Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> wrote:
>>     > Recently, I edited an answer to an old question about AS3 IDEs
>> recently (to add VSCode and Moonshine), and the original question (which
>> had been up for years) was almost instantly closed by moderators.
>> StackOverflow has become very strict about open-ended questions that are
>> more appropriate to discussion forums. Choose your questions wisely.
>>     >
>>     > More specific questions that can be solved with a small code
>> example are probably the best choice.
>>     >
>>     > Look for issues that come up frequently. For instance, there are
>> often problems if someone forgets to add a data binding bead to a
>> component. In the question, you'll want a component that is broken because
>> it's missing the bead. In the answer, show them which bead to add and where
>> it should be added.
>>     >
>>     > In fact, more questions involving beads are probably great
>> candidates!
>>     >
>>     > Question: How do I use some feature in component X.
>>     > Answer: This feature isn't enabled by default, but you can add Y
>> bead to the component.
>>     >
>>     > - Josh
>>     >
>>     > On 2019/03/04 13:14:09, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>     > > "apacheroyale" is fine with me.
>>     > >
>>     > > SO's tutorial suggests that open-ended discussion-type questions
>> fare worse
>>     > > on the site than specific, solution-focused questions. I wonder
>> if it would
>>     > > be considered spam to "recreate" some of the conversations on
>> tricky
>>     > > Flex-to-Royale issues that we have already talked through in this
>> channel.
>>     > > Feels a bit like reality-show tv to me... An alternative would be
>> to post
>>     > > some of the current, not-yet-resolved questions. We might even
>> attract
>>     > > interesting response from outside the existing Royale community.
>>     > >
>>     > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:57 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> [email protected]>
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > >
>>     > > > I'm opt for "apacheroyale" - I'm using it for almost all posts
>> on
>>     > > > Moonshine's IDE twitter and fb, so it could be somehow
>> consistent. ;)
>>     > > >
>>     > > > pon., 4 mar 2019 o 13:23 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]>
>> napisał(a):
>>     > > >
>>     > > > > Carlos and I were pondering possible tags for such an
>> adventure. Options
>>     > > > > seem to include "apacheroyale", "apache-royale", or just
>> plain "royale".
>>     > > > It
>>     > > > > is telling that none of these tags currently exist.
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > I am happy to lob softball questions to get conversations
>> started, maybe:
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > - What's the best migration path away from Flash for an
>> enterprise-level
>>     > > > > Flex app?
>>     > > > > - What are the options for IDEs for developing in JS? [I note
>> that
>>     > > > > "moonshine" is not a recognized tag on SO at the moment]
>>     > > > > - How can I reuse my AS3 and MXML code if Flash is not an
>> option?
>>     > > > > Other leading questions?
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > I am happy to be the naive question-asker, but of course
>> getting juice
>>     > > > into
>>     > > > > these conversations (and maybe drawing conversation-browsers
>> toward
>>     > > > Royale)
>>     > > > > depends on those who have already found Royale providing
>> answers.
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > a
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Carlos Rovira <
>> [email protected]>
>>     > > > > wrote:
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > > Hi,
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > I as you used Stackoverflow just for consulting. Just
>> create my account
>>     > > > > > now, so I'm learning too.
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > What does mean for Apache Royale? Nowadays, a way to
>> measure tech
>>     > > > impact
>>     > > > > > and how others could choose to go with Royale is see how
>> easy is to
>>     > > > find
>>     > > > > > answers to questions. So you know, we want to know how
>> something is
>>     > > > done
>>     > > > > > and people instead to go to normal docs, he google it, and
>> normally for
>>     > > > > > development problems stack overflow use to have responses.
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > So, how we could "start"? I think we'll need to enter some
>> common
>>     > > > > > questions and maybe respond ourselves ? I really don't
>> know, but there
>>     > > > > > should be some way to start and have a "apacheroyale" tag
>> for all the
>>     > > > > > question related to us.
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > For example, I think Andrew could be a good active to
>> starting this if
>>     > > > he
>>     > > > > > thing is interesting, both investigating the way to do it
>> and starting
>>     > > > > some
>>     > > > > > questions so we can answer and easing the rest of us
>> entering SO
>>     > > > world..
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > El lun., 4 mar. 2019 a las 10:42, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>     > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió:
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >> Same here with time for answering. By presence - what do
>> you mean ?
>>     > > > I'm
>>     > > > > >> rather read-only user for Stackoverflow - How does
>> presence of Royale
>>     > > > > can
>>     > > > > >> be printed there ?
>>     > > > > >>
>>     > > > > >> pon., 4 mar 2019 o 10:38 Harbs <[email protected]>
>> napisał(a):
>>     > > > > >>
>>     > > > > >> > Good idea, but I don’t know that I personally will have
>> time to
>>     > > > answer
>>     > > > > >> SO
>>     > > > > >> > questions.
>>     > > > > >> >
>>     > > > > >> > Harbs
>>     > > > > >> >
>>     > > > > >> > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Carlos Rovira <
>>     > > > [email protected]
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >> > wrote:
>>     > > > > >> > >
>>     > > > > >> > > Hi,
>>     > > > > >> > >
>>     > > > > >> > > I think one of our pending subjects is to be present on
>>     > > > > Stackoverflow.
>>     > > > > >> > > Starting to have questions and answers there and
>> increasing
>>     > > > presence
>>     > > > > >> over
>>     > > > > >> > > time should be a key goal for us.
>>     > > > > >> > > What do you think?
>>     > > > > >> > >
>>     > > > > >> > > Thanks
>>     > > > > >> > >
>>     > > > > >> > > --
>>     > > > > >> > > Carlos Rovira
>>     > > > > >> > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > > > > >> >
>>     > > > > >> >
>>     > > > > >>
>>     > > > > >> --
>>     > > > > >>
>>     > > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
>>     > > > > >>
>>     > > > > >> Patreon: *
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > > > > >> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> >*
>>     > > > > >>
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > > --
>>     > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>     > > > > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=1iU6%2FVaeWueZID2a9d%2BFBRhOsH6sD9Ko60XZhyuBlB8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > > >
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > > --
>>     > > > > Andrew Wetmore
>>     > > > >
>>     > > > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > > > >
>>     > > >
>>     > > >
>>     > > > --
>>     > > >
>>     > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>     > > >
>>     > > > Patreon: *
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > > > <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=kcGeJoth0t22Q6CbKEyjfjWf6St1ZkkWyRCMJraHA5Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> >*
>>     > > >
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     > > --
>>     > > Andrew Wetmore
>>     > >
>>     > >
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9f6019207c8c4cdf318108d6a0c05a43%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636873145344638488&amp;sdata=yKLxv%2FAi42MPuXgA%2F1mL1e9PVKhDwdANKt1Uy0cMK74%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     > >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to