Carlos, Everyone can add a comment to a question. Once you’ve earned enough reputation, you can actually ‘answer’ a question.
Reputation points are earned mainly through being upvoted by someone else. So, If your read a question which is interesting, upvote the question. If you read a comment or an answer which is good, upvote that. If you want to comment on a question or on a comment, don’t hesitate because that’s when other people can upvote your comment! Dany > Op 29 apr. 2019, om 18:50 heeft Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi, > agree too, I think the most convenient is "apache-royale", so go ahead. > > If I want to respond a question you post, I can do it directly? or I must > earn some points first doing something? > > thanks! > > > > El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 18:41, Piotr Zarzycki (< > [email protected]>) escribió: > >> Dany, >> >> Thanks. I'm personally fine if it is common to use apache-royale tag. >> Anyone is not in favor of that ? >> >> Piotr >> >> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:38 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> >> napisał(a): >> >>> Piotr, >>> >>> If you do a search on apache, here are some of the tags: >>> >>> apache-camel >>> apache-flink >>> apache-spark >>> apache-storm >>> … >>> >>> A few other examples: >>> >>> react-native >>> create-react-app >>> … >>> >>> Is you browse the tags on SO, you’ll see it’s very common. >>> >>> Also, npm naming conventions are all dash separated, or hyphen separated. >>> >>> I think we should follow this naming convention. >>> >>> Dany >>> >>> >>> >>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 18:14 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < >>> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>> Dany, >>>> >>>> Is it a common way on stack overflow ? It looks too me to complicated, >>> have >>>> something additional between two word. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:01 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> >>>> napisał(a): >>>> >>>>> Shouldn’t it be better to name it apache-royale? >>>>> That’s the way most tags are build I think >>>>> >>>>> Dany >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:58 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Dany, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have agreed on "apacheroyale" tag in different thread. I think you >>>>> could >>>>>> use that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Piotr >>>>>> >>>>>> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 17:56 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> >>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>> >>>>>>> Can somebody create some royale tags please? I don’t have enough >> rep. >>>>>>> points at this moment. >>>>>>> Also, shouldn’t we agree on some basic royale tags? >>>>>>> When the tags are made, I’ll start posting some questions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dany >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:27 heeft Alex Harui >> <[email protected] >>>> >>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow. I still >>> can't >>>>>>> figure out how to earn enough points be able to answer any questions >>> so >>>>> I >>>>>>> won't be of much help until that happens. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating >>> questions >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and >>>>>>> respond >>>>>>>> myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone >>>>>>> start to >>>>>>>> post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's >>>>>>> something I >>>>>>>> can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but >> we >>>>>>> must >>>>>>>> start in some way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me >> that >>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>> Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems >> there. >>>>>>> And >>>>>>>> this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale >> will >>>>>>> never >>>>>>>> succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some >>>>>>> work, what >>>>>>>> we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can >>> follow >>>>>>> you. >>>>>>>> Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and >>> respond. >>>>>>> If >>>>>>>> you start that your work will be follow :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can >>>>>>> work on >>>>>>>> that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on >> that. >>>>>>> Things >>>>>>>> like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something >>>>>>> really >>>>>>>> fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to >>>>> out >>>>>>>> wagon. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks for all the thoughts! :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala (< >>>>>>> [email protected]>) >>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt >>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The >>> mailing >>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>> should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using >>>>> Royale >>>>>>>>>> should go to SO >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ... >>>>>>>>>> Lots of developers are now used to those workflows. >>>>>>>>>> In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, >>>>> ready >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark >> for >>>>>>> Royale >>>>>>>>>> imo. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dany >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. The >>>>> docs >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> the alpha version is available here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support >> is >>>>> via >>>>>>>>>> these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that >>> I'm >>>>>>>>>> potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such >> that >>> I >>>>>>>>> have a >>>>>>>>>> rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day >>> or >>>>>>>>> two.. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the >>>>>>>>> mailing >>>>>>>>>> list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list >> threads >>>>>>> isn't >>>>>>>>>> the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up >>> from >>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>> very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I >> use >>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for >>>>> "royale" >>>>>>>>>> all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 >>>>> questions >>>>>>>>>> with "flexjs" tags. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to >>>>> contribute >>>>>>>>>> answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also >> the >>>>> dev >>>>>>>>>> perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and >>> perhaps >>>>>>>>> I'll >>>>>>>>>> have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing >> there....) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andrew >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39 >>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Angelo, that's great! :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> any help here is very appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to >>> work >>>>> on >>>>>>>>>> it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work >>> fit >>>>>>>>>> perfectly in the overall picture. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in >>> facebook >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (< >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>) >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or >> example >>>>>>>>>>>> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to >>>>> understand >>>>>>>>>>>> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a >>> few >>>>>>>>>>>> hours to start build their project. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Angelo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with latest comments. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users >>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> target >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to >> reach >>>>> 1.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that >>>>>>>>>>>>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing >>> ourselves >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> donate some >>>>>>>>>>>> hours >>>>>>>>>>>>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in >> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> current state I think we can get to it sooner. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (< >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>) >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform >>> where >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to >>> increase >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difficulty >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt the platform... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Angelo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great >> developer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing >>>>>>>>> features. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but >> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feels >>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-docs repo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs wiki >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs Readme >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ...? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is >>> available... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before >>> releasing >>>>>>>>> 1.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just my 2 cents, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olaf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Angelo Lazzari >>>>>>>>>>>> mobile: +34 683 137 087 >>>>>>>>>>>> mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify >>> that >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue >>> use, >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy the message and its copies. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>>> >>>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>> >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira
