Great! I'll follow your indications :) El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 18:55, Dany Dhondt (<[email protected]>) escribió:
> Carlos, > > Everyone can add a comment to a question. Once you’ve earned enough > reputation, you can actually ‘answer’ a question. > > Reputation points are earned mainly through being upvoted by someone else. > So, If your read a question which is interesting, upvote the question. > If you read a comment or an answer which is good, upvote that. > If you want to comment on a question or on a comment, don’t hesitate > because that’s when other people can upvote your comment! > > Dany > > > Op 29 apr. 2019, om 18:50 heeft Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Hi, > > agree too, I think the most convenient is "apache-royale", so go ahead. > > > > If I want to respond a question you post, I can do it directly? or I must > > earn some points first doing something? > > > > thanks! > > > > > > > > El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 18:41, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> Dany, > >> > >> Thanks. I'm personally fine if it is common to use apache-royale tag. > >> Anyone is not in favor of that ? > >> > >> Piotr > >> > >> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:38 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >>> Piotr, > >>> > >>> If you do a search on apache, here are some of the tags: > >>> > >>> apache-camel > >>> apache-flink > >>> apache-spark > >>> apache-storm > >>> … > >>> > >>> A few other examples: > >>> > >>> react-native > >>> create-react-app > >>> … > >>> > >>> Is you browse the tags on SO, you’ll see it’s very common. > >>> > >>> Also, npm naming conventions are all dash separated, or hyphen > separated. > >>> > >>> I think we should follow this naming convention. > >>> > >>> Dany > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 18:14 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > >>> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > >>>> > >>>> Dany, > >>>> > >>>> Is it a common way on stack overflow ? It looks too me to complicated, > >>> have > >>>> something additional between two word. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Piotr > >>>> > >>>> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:01 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> > >>>> napisał(a): > >>>> > >>>>> Shouldn’t it be better to name it apache-royale? > >>>>> That’s the way most tags are build I think > >>>>> > >>>>> Dany > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:58 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > >>>>> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Dany, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We have agreed on "apacheroyale" tag in different thread. I think > you > >>>>> could > >>>>>> use that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>> > >>>>>> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 17:56 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> > >>>>>> napisał(a): > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Can somebody create some royale tags please? I don’t have enough > >> rep. > >>>>>>> points at this moment. > >>>>>>> Also, shouldn’t we agree on some basic royale tags? > >>>>>>> When the tags are made, I’ll start posting some questions. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dany > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:27 heeft Alex Harui > >> <[email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow. I still > >>> can't > >>>>>>> figure out how to earn enough points be able to answer any > questions > >>> so > >>>>> I > >>>>>>> won't be of much help until that happens. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating > >>> questions > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>> SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and > >>>>>>> respond > >>>>>>>> myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone > >>>>>>> start to > >>>>>>>> post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's > >>>>>>> something I > >>>>>>>> can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but > >> we > >>>>>>> must > >>>>>>>> start in some way. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me > >> that > >>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>> Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems > >> there. > >>>>>>> And > >>>>>>>> this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale > >> will > >>>>>>> never > >>>>>>>> succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some > >>>>>>> work, what > >>>>>>>> we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can > >>> follow > >>>>>>> you. > >>>>>>>> Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and > >>> respond. > >>>>>>> If > >>>>>>>> you start that your work will be follow :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> @Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can > >>>>>>> work on > >>>>>>>> that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on > >> that. > >>>>>>> Things > >>>>>>>> like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> @Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something > >>>>>>> really > >>>>>>>> fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to > >>>>> out > >>>>>>>> wagon. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> thanks for all the thoughts! :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala (< > >>>>>>> [email protected]>) > >>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt > >>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The > >>> mailing > >>>>>>> list > >>>>>>>>>> should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using > >>>>> Royale > >>>>>>>>>> should go to SO > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ... > >>>>>>>>>> Lots of developers are now used to those workflows. > >>>>>>>>>> In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, > >>>>> ready > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark > >> for > >>>>>>> Royale > >>>>>>>>>> imo. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Dany > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. > The > >>>>> docs > >>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> the alpha version is available here: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> Om > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew < > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support > >> is > >>>>> via > >>>>>>>>>> these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious > that > >>> I'm > >>>>>>>>>> potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such > >> that > >>> I > >>>>>>>>> have a > >>>>>>>>>> rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every > day > >>> or > >>>>>>>>> two.. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search > the > >>>>>>>>> mailing > >>>>>>>>>> list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list > >> threads > >>>>>>> isn't > >>>>>>>>>> the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up > >>> from > >>>>>>>>> them > >>>>>>>>>> very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I > >> use > >>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>> lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for > >>>>> "royale" > >>>>>>>>>> all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 > >>>>> questions > >>>>>>>>>> with "flexjs" tags. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to > >>>>> contribute > >>>>>>>>>> answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also > >> the > >>>>> dev > >>>>>>>>>> perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and > >>> perhaps > >>>>>>>>> I'll > >>>>>>>>>> have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing > >> there....) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> thanks > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Andrew > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>>>> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39 > >>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Angelo, that's great! :) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> any help here is very appreciated. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to > >>> work > >>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>> it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your > work > >>> fit > >>>>>>>>>> perfectly in the overall picture. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in > >>> facebook > >>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>) > >>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or > >> example > >>>>>>>>>>>> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to > >>>>> understand > >>>>>>>>>>>> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a > >>> few > >>>>>>>>>>>> hours to start build their project. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Angelo > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree with latest comments. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new > users > >>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> target > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to > >> reach > >>>>> 1.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing > >>> ourselves > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> donate some > >>>>>>>>>>>> hours > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in > >> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> current state I think we can get to it sooner. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (< > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform > >>> where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to > >>> increase > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the difficulty > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt the platform... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Angelo > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great > >> developer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing > >>>>>>>>> features. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but > >> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feels > >>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-docs repo > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs wiki > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs Readme > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ...? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is > >>> available... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before > >>> releasing > >>>>>>>>> 1.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just my 2 cents, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olaf > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Angelo Lazzari > >>>>>>>>>>>> mobile: +34 683 137 087 > >>>>>>>>>>>> mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify > >>> that > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue > >>> use, > >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy the message and its copies. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >>>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>>> > >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
