Hi, agree too, I think the most convenient is "apache-royale", so go ahead.
If I want to respond a question you post, I can do it directly? or I must earn some points first doing something? thanks! El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 18:41, Piotr Zarzycki (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Dany, > > Thanks. I'm personally fine if it is common to use apache-royale tag. > Anyone is not in favor of that ? > > Piotr > > pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:38 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > Piotr, > > > > If you do a search on apache, here are some of the tags: > > > > apache-camel > > apache-flink > > apache-spark > > apache-storm > > … > > > > A few other examples: > > > > react-native > > create-react-app > > … > > > > Is you browse the tags on SO, you’ll see it’s very common. > > > > Also, npm naming conventions are all dash separated, or hyphen separated. > > > > I think we should follow this naming convention. > > > > Dany > > > > > > > > > Op 29 apr. 2019, om 18:14 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > > [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > > > > > Dany, > > > > > > Is it a common way on stack overflow ? It looks too me to complicated, > > have > > > something additional between two word. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Piotr > > > > > > pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 18:01 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > >> Shouldn’t it be better to name it apache-royale? > > >> That’s the way most tags are build I think > > >> > > >> Dany > > >> > > >> > > >>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:58 heeft Piotr Zarzycki < > > >> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > >>> > > >>> Hi Dany, > > >>> > > >>> We have agreed on "apacheroyale" tag in different thread. I think you > > >> could > > >>> use that. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Piotr > > >>> > > >>> pon., 29 kwi 2019 o 17:56 Dany Dhondt <[email protected]> > > >>> napisał(a): > > >>> > > >>>> Can somebody create some royale tags please? I don’t have enough > rep. > > >>>> points at this moment. > > >>>> Also, shouldn’t we agree on some basic royale tags? > > >>>> When the tags are made, I’ll start posting some questions. > > >>>> > > >>>> Dany > > >>>> > > >>>>> Op 29 apr. 2019, om 17:27 heeft Alex Harui > <[email protected] > > > > > >>>> het volgende geschreven: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I agree we want to develop a presence on Stack Overflow. I still > > can't > > >>>> figure out how to earn enough points be able to answer any questions > > so > > >> I > > >>>> won't be of much help until that happens. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -Alex > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 4/29/19, 7:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> about StackOverFlow, we already discussed to start creating > > questions > > >>>> in > > >>>>> SOF, but finally nobody does. I think I should not create one and > > >>>> respond > > >>>>> myself right? it will be very sad to do in that way. So if someone > > >>>> start to > > >>>>> post questions in SOF, I promise to respond, at least if it's > > >>>> something I > > >>>>> can know how to respond. It could be things you already know, but > we > > >>>> must > > >>>>> start in some way. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> SOF is crucial for us, I talked with customers that pointed me > that > > >>>> Apache > > >>>>> Royale is not on SOF, so his devs can easily search problems > there. > > >>>> And > > >>>>> this is the google for developers. If we are not there, Royale > will > > >>>> never > > >>>>> succeed, So if you want Royale to succeed we all should put some > > >>>> work, what > > >>>>> we can, in SOF. @dany, if you want to start this effort we can > > follow > > >>>> you. > > >>>>> Just let's know in a mail here so we can go to that link and > > respond. > > >>>> If > > >>>>> you start that your work will be follow :) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> @Andrew, "Flex In a Week" is a very good idea too. I think we can > > >>>> work on > > >>>>> that, but again, we need some kind of plan. A team to work on > that. > > >>>> Things > > >>>>> like that can't be create by only one man's work. Volunteers? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> @Om, I not use NPM but will try Royale CLI since we need something > > >>>> really > > >>>>> fast to compete with React or others, or people will never jump to > > >> out > > >>>>> wagon. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> thanks for all the thoughts! :) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> El lun., 29 abr. 2019 a las 9:17, OmPrakash Muppirala (< > > >>>> [email protected]>) > > >>>>> escribió: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dany Dhondt > > >> <[email protected] > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I’m all for buikding a knowledge base in Stack Overflow! The > > mailing > > >>>> list > > >>>>>>> should only be used for developing Royale. Questions about using > > >> Royale > > >>>>>>> should go to SO > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The competitors of Royale are React, Vue, Angular, ... > > >>>>>>> Lots of developers are now used to those workflows. > > >>>>>>> In case of React, create-react-app sets you up with a brand new, > > >> ready > > >>>> to > > >>>>>>> go project in less than 30 seconds. That should be a benchmark > for > > >>>> Royale > > >>>>>>> imo. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Dany > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> The Royale CLI is modeled closely after the create-react-app. The > > >> docs > > >>>> for > > >>>>>> the alpha version is available here: > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2Fnpm%2Fcli&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=4VN8JejglMeW08ZcNV6fCJ%2BdYJjOHcvfGDL099jives%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>> If I get more feedback, I am keep improving this tool. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>> Om > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Op 26 apr. 2019 om 12:42 heeft Frost, Andrew < > > >> [email protected] > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> One other thought ... currently the way people ask for support > is > > >> via > > >>>>>>> these mailing lists. Which are okay but I'm always conscious that > > I'm > > >>>>>>> potentially spamming people, plus the volume of mails is such > that > > I > > >>>>>> have a > > >>>>>>> rule to push all these into a folder that I then review every day > > or > > >>>>>> two.. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> But if I want to find something out, I tend not to go search the > > >>>>>> mailing > > >>>>>>> list, I tend to search online. Looking through mailing list > threads > > >>>> isn't > > >>>>>>> the easiest (and search engines don't necessarily pick things up > > from > > >>>>>> them > > >>>>>>> very well) but a major source of support is Stack Overflow... I > use > > >>>> this > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>>> lot with my other work and there's a lot of information there. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Apache Royale doesn't appear to have a tag; when I search for > > >> "royale" > > >>>>>>> all I got was stuff about "Clash Royale"; there are however 8 > > >> questions > > >>>>>>> with "flexjs" tags. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> But wouldn't it be good for people to add questions and to > > >> contribute > > >>>>>>> answers there, both from the user perspective and perhaps also > the > > >> dev > > >>>>>>> perspective? Would be interested in people's thoughts... (and > > perhaps > > >>>>>> I'll > > >>>>>>> have to dig out my SO credentials to start contributing > there....) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> thanks > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Andrew > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > > >>>>>>>> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]] > > >>>>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2019 10:39 > > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Let's bump Royale version to 1.0 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Angelo, that's great! :) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> any help here is very appreciated. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Share in a new mail a concrete contribution before starting to > > work > > >> on > > >>>>>>> it, so we can know about it and help you on the task so your work > > fit > > >>>>>>> perfectly in the overall picture. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I'd like to create videos too, and people asked about it in > > facebook > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>> twitter. Do you have skills in creating videos? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 10:47, Angelo Lazzari (< > > >>>>>>> [email protected]>) > > >>>>>>>> escribió: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Yes, i can give some slots to help with documentation or > example > > >>>>>>>>> project or so... I think tutorial videos could be help to > > >> understand > > >>>>>>>>> rapidly the platform and could help new user to get ready in a > > few > > >>>>>>>>> hours to start build their project. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Angelo > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:42 AM Carlos Rovira > > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Agree with latest comments. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we should work in docs and ease the start of new users > > to > > >>>>>>>>>> target > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.0 > > >>>>>>>>>> And in the process fix some few things (i.e: don't want to > reach > > >> 1.0 > > >>>>>>>>>> with Jewel Table in its current state and API) > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> What do you think? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> If you all agree could you think on how to contribute to that > > >>>>>>>>>> effort? Can we have as a near goal to bring 1.0 planing > > ourselves > > >> to > > >>>>>>>>>> donate some > > >>>>>>>>> hours > > >>>>>>>>>> to Apache Royale to make this happen? If some of us help in > the > > >>>>>>>>>> current state I think we can get to it sooner. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 a las 9:57, Angelo Lazzari (< > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>) > > >>>>>>>>>> escribió: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I am completely agree with Olaf: start using a new platform > > where > > >>>>>>>>>>> the documentation is not complete, clean and updated it is a > > >>>>>>>>>>> really bad thing...and it would be a potential reason to > > increase > > >>>>>>>>>>> the difficulty > > >>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>> adopt the platform... > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Angelo > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 26 abr. 2019 8:54, Olaf Krueger < > [email protected] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> escribió: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, I think it's important to provide a great > developer > > >>>>>>>>>>> experience. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, that's more important than trying to implement missing > > >>>>>> features. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> One thing to achieve this is documentation of course. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all of you there already exist a lot of docs, but > it > > >>>>>>>>>>>> feels > > >>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>> bit > > >>>>>>>>>>>> messy because they are hosted at different places, e.g.: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-docs repo > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs wiki > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - royale-asjs Readme > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3SEvxFs2HbjNAgsLBEtNLr17Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512477017&sdata=XvGTE3ep7PGJtBuzlJqJmRtzxFLiW3GmkV1eh%2F86%2BY0%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - ...? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As a user, it's hard to get an overview of what is > > available... > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>> where. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's a good idea to consolidate the docs before > > releasing > > >>>>>> 1.0. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just my 2 cents, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Olaf > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F3LM5ngUtumonkv3VTyrZRJ77Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=yxwkdwmp0ecdXr4O1Dv2OKH03yDDunVMLIauChDKoo4%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> %3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=8yjFFtRFlwh79EDsxRWNwNBP%2BeK3D%2BQiBlscondNn%2FM%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>>>>>> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> Angelo Lazzari > > >>>>>>>>> mobile: +34 683 137 087 > > >>>>>>>>> mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>> Verify the correspondence of the addressee; otherwise, notify > > that > > >> to > > >>>>>>>>> the sender and, conscious of the responsibility for the undue > > use, > > >>>>>>>>> destroy the message and its copies. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclicktime.symantec.com%2F38jVp7aJ4ouZou8k1qd97Hn7Vc%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fabout.me%252Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=EJE8iBmKz3wl8nUyLoeMlxg%2ByDKKSbSGkv%2FaI1KudZU%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C950f12a2b0f24cad192508d6ccaf8241%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636921451512487013&sdata=HqD%2BhpX%2BM36WaF0edrKO5MlYZnIZCuVibKBN3pLx%2FKg%3D&reserved=0 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> Piotr Zarzycki > > >>> > > >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
