I'm trying to find that, but currently in release mode navigation doesn't
work at all - I moved back to the oldest build [1] and have same issue. In
the other words in release mode I don't see any content at all. I'm going
to prepare separate example which shows that issue.

[1]
http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/1051/

czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:46 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
> can you share how it was looking until now?
> Other option is to find from where commit started to fail
>
>
> El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> [email protected]>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Your latest changes to containers messed up our UI in app. [1] I will
> > adjust it, but I'm really not sure what is actually happen that we have
> so
> > much mess there.
> >
> > [1] https://ibb.co/CPkxx8S
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > śr., 18 mar 2020 o 16:57 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I'll try your sugestion about the flex grow. I revised the flex box
> code
> > > and in fact columns right now does not use flex config
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 16:45, Alex Harui
> (<[email protected]
> > >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/18/20, 3:12 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > >     I'm experimenting for this concrete case with a calc(% - px)
> > formula
> > > > that
> > > >     could work. don't like it so much since it means is something
> very
> > > "JS"
> > > >     coupled but it should maintain responsiveness. Crossing fingers
> :)
> > > >
> > > > IMO, there is something already "very JS" in the code.  You are using
> > > > display="flex" instead of running a layout pass on each container and
> > > > child.  Which is the right thing to do, IMO, but has implications.
> If
> > > your
> > > > calc idea doesn't work out, I wonder what would happen if you simply
> > > > translated percentWidth on the columns to flexGrow or whatever
> > attributes
> > > > give relative sizes to the children in a flexbox.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >     El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 3:44, Alex Harui
> > > (<[email protected]
> > > > >)
> > > >     escribió:
> > > >
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >     > On 3/17/20, 5:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >     >
> > > >     >     Hi Alex,
> > > >     >
> > > >     >     I'll try to see how things are done in MXRoyale's ADG for
> > > > columns.
> > > >     > Really
> > > >     >     the problem right now is in that concrete case. I'm sure
> > > there's
> > > > some
> > > >     > way
> > > >     >     to do it but while I'm using flex box already as you
> suggest
> > > for
> > > > many
> > > >     >     things, in this case I need to do calculations, since all
> is
> > > > based on
> > > >     > how
> > > >     >     users will configure the columns via mxml with a mix (or
> not)
> > > of
> > > >     > pixels and
> > > >     >     percentages.
> > > >     >
> > > >     > And because you are using display="flex", not having the child
> > > > columns
> > > >     > also be CSS compliant with the width is probably causing the
> > pain.
> > > > That's
> > > >     > what I saw with MXRoyale.
> > > >     > You may be able to calculate the numbers, but then the columns
> > will
> > > > not be
> > > >     > responsive as the "flex" container changes size.  You will have
> > to
> > > > detect
> > > >     > that and recompute.
> > > >     >
> > > >     > If you instead using the weighting system that "flex" children
> > > use, I
> > > >     > think you will have less pain and more responsive-ness.  Users
> > > might
> > > > gladly
> > > >     > give up on the old Flex percentWidth overloading in favor of
> the
> > > > weighting
> > > >     > system to get that responsiveness.
> > > >     >
> > > >     > My 2 cents,
> > > >     > -Alex
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >
> > > >     --
> > > >     Carlos Rovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc089fb86c6e9419f5a5d08d7cb24d510%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637201231364732539&amp;sdata=sl2FCZYFAeC9gGjhlZIK1TMTkxQCtsUjJgmqIOS0xWo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to