Hi Carlos, Your last changes helped. I had to still make a lot of adjustment, but they were quite good - I have removed lot's of percentWidth/Height sets, which seems to be good.
Thanks, Piotr pt., 20 mar 2020 o 00:53 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > I fixed some things in Jewel today. Don't know if are related to your > problem, but I Cann't help you if you don't provide me some file that I can > plug into TDJ to test and see what generates. Some minimal code will > perfect for me to try. > > Thanks > > > > El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 16:47, Carlos Rovira (<[email protected] > >) > escribió: > > > It will be of help to see what could be the problem is you send to me (or > > here) just the structure of that file. For example > > > > <j:SectionContent> > > <j:Card width="500"> > > .... > > </j:Card> > > </j:SectionContent> > > > > So I can try in TDJ and see what could be the problem. > > Avoid any other code like Scripting, bindings or unneeded beads > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 16:12, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > >> Carlos, > >> > >> Despite of problems with Binding which I have described in separate > thread > >> - Issue with sizing which you are seeing on my screenshot still exists. > >> You > >> are asking how it was looking until now here you have -> > >> https://ibb.co/LtcqWH1 > >> > >> In different view it looks like that -> https://ibb.co/C26Qvr7 - Card > is > >> stretched for some reason to weird sizes. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Piotr > >> > >> > >> > >> czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:54 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >> > I'm trying to find that, but currently in release mode navigation > >> doesn't > >> > work at all - I moved back to the oldest build [1] and have same > issue. > >> In > >> > the other words in release mode I don't see any content at all. I'm > >> going > >> > to prepare separate example which shows that issue. > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > > >> > http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/1051/ > >> > > >> > czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:46 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > >> > napisał(a): > >> > > >> >> Hi Piotr, > >> >> can you share how it was looking until now? > >> >> Other option is to find from where commit started to fail > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:07, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> >> [email protected]>) escribió: > >> >> > >> >> > Hi Carlos, > >> >> > > >> >> > Your latest changes to containers messed up our UI in app. [1] I > will > >> >> > adjust it, but I'm really not sure what is actually happen that we > >> have > >> >> so > >> >> > much mess there. > >> >> > > >> >> > [1] https://ibb.co/CPkxx8S > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Piotr > >> >> > > >> >> > śr., 18 mar 2020 o 16:57 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > >> >> > napisał(a): > >> >> > > >> >> > > Hi Alex, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I'll try your sugestion about the flex grow. I revised the flex > box > >> >> code > >> >> > > and in fact columns right now does not use flex config > >> >> > > thanks > >> >> > > > >> >> > > El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 16:45, Alex Harui > >> >> (<[email protected] > >> >> > >) > >> >> > > escribió: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > On 3/18/20, 3:12 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Hi Alex, > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > I'm experimenting for this concrete case with a calc(% - > px) > >> >> > formula > >> >> > > > that > >> >> > > > could work. don't like it so much since it means is > something > >> >> very > >> >> > > "JS" > >> >> > > > coupled but it should maintain responsiveness. Crossing > >> fingers > >> >> :) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > IMO, there is something already "very JS" in the code. You are > >> >> using > >> >> > > > display="flex" instead of running a layout pass on each > container > >> >> and > >> >> > > > child. Which is the right thing to do, IMO, but has > >> implications. > >> >> If > >> >> > > your > >> >> > > > calc idea doesn't work out, I wonder what would happen if you > >> simply > >> >> > > > translated percentWidth on the columns to flexGrow or whatever > >> >> > attributes > >> >> > > > give relative sizes to the children in a flexbox. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > -Alex > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 3:44, Alex Harui > >> >> > > (<[email protected] > >> >> > > > >) > >> >> > > > escribió: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > On 3/17/20, 5:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" < > >> [email protected] > >> >> > > >> >> > > > wrote: > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Hi Alex, > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > I'll try to see how things are done in MXRoyale's ADG > >> for > >> >> > > > columns. > >> >> > > > > Really > >> >> > > > > the problem right now is in that concrete case. I'm > >> sure > >> >> > > there's > >> >> > > > some > >> >> > > > > way > >> >> > > > > to do it but while I'm using flex box already as you > >> >> suggest > >> >> > > for > >> >> > > > many > >> >> > > > > things, in this case I need to do calculations, since > >> all > >> >> is > >> >> > > > based on > >> >> > > > > how > >> >> > > > > users will configure the columns via mxml with a mix > >> (or > >> >> not) > >> >> > > of > >> >> > > > > pixels and > >> >> > > > > percentages. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > And because you are using display="flex", not having the > >> child > >> >> > > > columns > >> >> > > > > also be CSS compliant with the width is probably causing > >> the > >> >> > pain. > >> >> > > > That's > >> >> > > > > what I saw with MXRoyale. > >> >> > > > > You may be able to calculate the numbers, but then the > >> columns > >> >> > will > >> >> > > > not be > >> >> > > > > responsive as the "flex" container changes size. You > will > >> >> have > >> >> > to > >> >> > > > detect > >> >> > > > > that and recompute. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > If you instead using the weighting system that "flex" > >> children > >> >> > > use, I > >> >> > > > > think you will have less pain and more responsive-ness. > >> Users > >> >> > > might > >> >> > > > gladly > >> >> > > > > give up on the old Flex percentWidth overloading in favor > >> of > >> >> the > >> >> > > > weighting > >> >> > > > > system to get that responsiveness. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > My 2 cents, > >> >> > > > > -Alex > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > -- > >> >> > > > Carlos Rovira > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc089fb86c6e9419f5a5d08d7cb24d510%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637201231364732539&sdata=sl2FCZYFAeC9gGjhlZIK1TMTkxQCtsUjJgmqIOS0xWo%3D&reserved=0 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Carlos Rovira > >> >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > > >> >> > Piotr Zarzycki > >> >> > > >> >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >> >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Carlos Rovira > >> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
