It will be of help to see what could be the problem is you send to me (or
here) just the structure of that file. For example

<j:SectionContent>
     <j:Card width="500">
          ....
    </j:Card>
</j:SectionContent>

So I can try in TDJ and  see what could be the problem.
Avoid any other code like Scripting, bindings or unneeded beads

Thanks



El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 16:12, Piotr Zarzycki (<
[email protected]>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Despite of problems with Binding which I have described in separate thread
> - Issue with sizing which you are seeing on my screenshot still exists. You
> are asking how it was looking until now here you have ->
> https://ibb.co/LtcqWH1
>
> In different view it looks like that -> https://ibb.co/C26Qvr7 - Card is
> stretched for some reason to weird sizes.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
>
> czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:54 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> napisał(a):
>
> > I'm trying to find that, but currently in release mode navigation doesn't
> > work at all - I moved back to the oldest build [1] and have same issue.
> In
> > the other words in release mode I don't see any content at all. I'm going
> > to prepare separate example which shows that issue.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/1051/
> >
> > czw., 19 mar 2020 o 13:46 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi Piotr,
> >> can you share how it was looking until now?
> >> Other option is to find from where commit started to fail
> >>
> >>
> >> El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 12:07, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> [email protected]>) escribió:
> >>
> >> > Hi Carlos,
> >> >
> >> > Your latest changes to containers messed up our UI in app. [1] I will
> >> > adjust it, but I'm really not sure what is actually happen that we
> have
> >> so
> >> > much mess there.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://ibb.co/CPkxx8S
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Piotr
> >> >
> >> > śr., 18 mar 2020 o 16:57 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>
> >> > napisał(a):
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Alex,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'll try your sugestion about the flex grow. I revised the flex box
> >> code
> >> > > and in fact columns right now does not use flex config
> >> > > thanks
> >> > >
> >> > > El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 16:45, Alex Harui
> >> (<[email protected]
> >> > >)
> >> > > escribió:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 3/18/20, 3:12 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >     Hi Alex,
> >> > > >
> >> > > >     I'm experimenting for this concrete case with a calc(% - px)
> >> > formula
> >> > > > that
> >> > > >     could work. don't like it so much since it means is something
> >> very
> >> > > "JS"
> >> > > >     coupled but it should maintain responsiveness. Crossing
> fingers
> >> :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > IMO, there is something already "very JS" in the code.  You are
> >> using
> >> > > > display="flex" instead of running a layout pass on each container
> >> and
> >> > > > child.  Which is the right thing to do, IMO, but has implications.
> >> If
> >> > > your
> >> > > > calc idea doesn't work out, I wonder what would happen if you
> simply
> >> > > > translated percentWidth on the columns to flexGrow or whatever
> >> > attributes
> >> > > > give relative sizes to the children in a flexbox.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Alex
> >> > > >
> >> > > >     El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 3:44, Alex Harui
> >> > > (<[email protected]
> >> > > > >)
> >> > > >     escribió:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     > On 3/17/20, 5:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <
> [email protected]
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     >     Hi Alex,
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     >     I'll try to see how things are done in MXRoyale's ADG
> for
> >> > > > columns.
> >> > > >     > Really
> >> > > >     >     the problem right now is in that concrete case. I'm sure
> >> > > there's
> >> > > > some
> >> > > >     > way
> >> > > >     >     to do it but while I'm using flex box already as you
> >> suggest
> >> > > for
> >> > > > many
> >> > > >     >     things, in this case I need to do calculations, since
> all
> >> is
> >> > > > based on
> >> > > >     > how
> >> > > >     >     users will configure the columns via mxml with a mix (or
> >> not)
> >> > > of
> >> > > >     > pixels and
> >> > > >     >     percentages.
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     > And because you are using display="flex", not having the
> child
> >> > > > columns
> >> > > >     > also be CSS compliant with the width is probably causing the
> >> > pain.
> >> > > > That's
> >> > > >     > what I saw with MXRoyale.
> >> > > >     > You may be able to calculate the numbers, but then the
> columns
> >> > will
> >> > > > not be
> >> > > >     > responsive as the "flex" container changes size.  You will
> >> have
> >> > to
> >> > > > detect
> >> > > >     > that and recompute.
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     > If you instead using the weighting system that "flex"
> children
> >> > > use, I
> >> > > >     > think you will have less pain and more responsive-ness.
> Users
> >> > > might
> >> > > > gladly
> >> > > >     > give up on the old Flex percentWidth overloading in favor of
> >> the
> >> > > > weighting
> >> > > >     > system to get that responsiveness.
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     > My 2 cents,
> >> > > >     > -Alex
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >     >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >     --
> >> > > >     Carlos Rovira
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc089fb86c6e9419f5a5d08d7cb24d510%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637201231364732539&amp;sdata=sl2FCZYFAeC9gGjhlZIK1TMTkxQCtsUjJgmqIOS0xWo%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Carlos Rovira
> >> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to