I also doesn't understand that based on experience of one person (me) you
guys would reinvent the wheel. ;) It looks like you are going to do that
despite any argument provide it here.

No matter what would be the outcome I will most likely stick with steps on
remote machine, cause I don't want to do anything on my machine at all. -
This was one the biggest advantage when everything started to work for me.

In case of bigger fish to fry - one those is current improvement to Binding
and some layout changes which causes me 5 days of headache in our
application and at the end of my work day today app still doesn't work as
it was before. :)

czw., 19 mar 2020 o 23:04 Alex Harui <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> Carlos,
>
> Using the CI steps for a release will likely help you learn about what is
> really involved in the Royale release process.  If Chris is going to get
> the steps to work, then your job should be as simple as making sure each
> step works for you, and actually doing the commits and signing of artifacts.
>
> Once we get the steps working and a release out, you are welcome to create
> a branch and try other things since working in a branch will not affect
> others who may want to make a release from develop.  And then we will have
> something to compare.  I still want to discourage such an effort, as I
> think it will only result in repeating history where you and Chris will get
> something to work and then it won't work for others.  That's what happened
> to me.  Other PMC members who want to see you and Chris spend time on this
> should probably commit to spending time testing your work.  This makes me
> sad that we are going to spend so much time on this as I think there are
> much bigger fish to fry.  But apparently this is what enough folks want.
>
> Sadly,
> -Alex
>
> On 3/19/20, 2:48 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Hi Alex,
>
>     I can accept to be the RM for this 0.9.7, but I have a notion of how
> hard
>     it could be (since I spend a considerable amount of time trying to fix
> what
>     Chris did in just 1 day). I think if we're going to do this, I expect
> we
>     can then continue improving the process, as we asked in yesterday's
> thread.
>     I think we got most support for the rest of the team here, and to got
> yours
>     too, taking into account that if we don't reach anything good we'll
> stick
>     with what we already have.
>
>     Let me know what you think
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Carlos
>
>     El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 19:01, Alex Harui
> (<[email protected]>)
>     escribió:
>
>     > IMO, Carlos, you will have to be the RM to help prove out that the CI
>     > process is working again
>     >
>     > -Alex
>     >
>     > On 3/19/20, 10:34 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi Chris,
>     >     thanks for the note
>     >     :)
>     >
>     >     El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 18:17, Christofer Dutz (<
>     >     [email protected]>) escribió:
>     >
>     >     > Ahem ...
>     >     >
>     >     > well ... I haven't tested my changes on the build steps ... I
>     > adjusted
>     >     > what I was told was broken.
>     >     >
>     >     > However if I was to test them I would sort of be doing a
> release and
>     > that
>     >     > would feel really strange ;-)
>     >     >
>     >     > I am totally willing to be of assistance to help the next RM
> do his
>     > job
>     >     > however and I am sure I'll be able to get the steps technically
>     > working.
>     >     >
>     >     > Chris
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > Am 19.03.20, 18:12 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <
> [email protected]
>     > >:
>     >     >
>     >     >     Hi,
>     >     >
>     >     >     now that Chris fixed CI Release Steps I think we are ready
> to do
>     > a new
>     >     >     release.
>     >     >     So I want to ask if someone can take the role of Release
> Manager
>     > and
>     >     > use
>     >     >     the current process to release 0.9.7
>     >     >
>     >     >     Thanks
>     >     >
>     >     >     --
>     >     >     Carlos Rovira
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdc687414826247856ac708d7cc4f3bef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637202512998577756&amp;sdata=M44Z0DAv%2FAMFRxA7nGlHUwtOw4uPZjTbxs9yZoUuUSY%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Carlos Rovira
>     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdc687414826247856ac708d7cc4f3bef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637202512998587751&amp;sdata=8fb2gUM%2BQ%2BKqC0apBz6g3kOMhQPx%2B0%2F9w4heGCEPIIs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cdc687414826247856ac708d7cc4f3bef%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637202512998587751&amp;sdata=8fb2gUM%2BQ%2BKqC0apBz6g3kOMhQPx%2B0%2F9w4heGCEPIIs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to