It was a rewarding experience in terms of learning about aspects of Royale that I would have neglected otherwise. This is a good opportunity to thank Alex putting in all the hard work that made this release possible.
From: Harbs<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 11:47 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [RESULT] Release Apache Royale 0.9.7 Thank you Yishay for your perseverance in getting this release done! > On May 13, 2020, at 10:49 AM, Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Total binding votes: 5 +1s and 1 +0 > > Total non-binding votes: 1 -1 > > From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:31 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.7 > > Please use [RESULT] tag in the subject and separate total binding votes and > put non-binding votes on a different line. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 5/13/20, 12:22 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Vote passes with FIVE +1 ONE +0 and ONE -1. Thanks to all those who took > the time to review this release. It should make the next one even better. > > From: Harbs<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:40 PM > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.7 > > +1 > Package > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-src.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499341903&sdata=eriysK%2FfYNS8v%2Bzd1tCb%2BohPjjR0MxdTV78FaJMrBTc%3D&reserved=0 > Java 1.8 > OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.14.6 > Source kit signatures match: y > Source kit builds: y > README is ok: y > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > NOTICE is ok: y > LICENSE is ok: y > No unapproved licenses or archives: y > No unapproved binaries: y > Package > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js-swf.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499341903&sdata=qYRNA39jPDjV2RLiFQsy%2B%2BOS5dI1WuhS59FiN8chFbw%3D&reserved=0 > Binary kit signatures match: y > NOTICE is ok: y > LICENSE is ok: y > No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y > No unapproved binaries in binary package: y > > The release is not perfect, but it’s a definite improvement and long > overdue. I’m voting +1 to get the release out, and we should follow up with > the issues that were discovered before the next release. > > More notes: > * I was able to use the release to correctly build a complex app. > * There are issues with URLs including http instead of https and > references to royale.codeoscopic.com > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Froyale.codeoscopic.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=pty%2BLiG7nHmmnu79MFAqJ3FdxmJJEHedjHO91iXi6fs%3D&reserved=0>. > I fixed this in the develop branch and I don’t think it’s significant enough > to delay the release. > * I fixed the small typo that Chris mention in the RELEASE notes in > develop as well. > * We should use an apache email address for the signature for the next > release (should be me), but I did not see anywhere that it’s a requirement — > just that there’s a valid signature. > * I’ll have to pay attention to SNAPSHOT references when I do the next > release. I’m going to need guidance on the best way to handle that. > * I’m not sure what Chris’ issues were with references in the various meta > files. I’d like to follow up on that before the next release. > * I didn’t see an issue with RAT. Not sure what that was about. > * The failure of ant clean is normal when clean is run twice. > * Carlos: I think you added OpenSans. Can you add the reference to the > NOTICE file in develop? > >> >> Am 08.05.20, 13:28 schrieb "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi, >> This is the vote for the 0.9.7 release of Apache Royale. The release >> candidate can be found here; >> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=wDhf8b2LdDd9TnW8CDuXzDBG1ZP6xkDCUo%2F%2FbqmMn44%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on >> approving a release?', at: >> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=rQundb9FSLlKjx0tzt7OwBsKyidu4Z1nOLFlGYbWzg0%3D&reserved=0 >> >> At a minimum you would be expected to check that: >> - SHA and signed packages are correct >> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine >> - That the build script completes successfully >> - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK. >> >> The KEYS file is at >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2FKEYS&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=l2nBhO0uw9vnSAxIXu%2FGXK3h9xG0ocmUUO5Q%2BBUt2lI%3D&reserved=0 >> >> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos. >> >> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is >> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the >> -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via: >> ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml >> >> You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be >> installed via: >> npm install >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=npcpezRiIRwlrx0tdXFV9JhXeYfIq3jyYhsqV8kffwk%3D&reserved=0 >> >> The full package with SWF support can be installed via: >> >> npm install >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js-swf.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=zhf%2Btjp01HvVs%2FPeABNtCPwCwlQFb43Rw9nzpZLqi%2FI%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Maven artifacts are staged here: >> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapacheroyale-1077&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=%2BhqWJWkjjobZu2tHTywIXWqomg%2BX4h3yGHQcTP6Nty0%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> +1 Approve the release >> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why) >> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. >> >> The vote passes if there is: >> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC >> - More positive votes than negative votes >> >> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be >> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC, >> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that >> folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC >> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes >> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. >> >> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR >> version you tested with. >> >> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common >> steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the >> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: >> 1) create an empty folder, >> 2) download into that folder this file: >> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2FApproveRoyale.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=CFzd3qHnLF3%2FU4Fic2iSZAYVw3K27uhC2VPta8LaK8c%3D&reserved=0 >> 3) run the script: >> ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.7 -Drc=5 >> If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use: >> ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.7 -Drc=5 >> -Duse-flash=true >> >> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages >> and build results are always encouraged. >> >> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not >> this VOTE thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Yishay Weiss >> > > >
