Thank you Yishay for your perseverance in getting this release done!
> On May 13, 2020, at 10:49 AM, Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Total binding votes: 5 +1s and 1 +0
>
> Total non-binding votes: 1 -1
>
> From: Alex Harui<mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:31 AM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.7
>
> Please use [RESULT] tag in the subject and separate total binding votes and
> put non-binding votes on a different line.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/13/20, 12:22 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Vote passes with FIVE +1 ONE +0 and ONE -1. Thanks to all those who took
> the time to review this release. It should make the next one even better.
>
> From: Harbs<mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:40 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.7
>
> +1
> Package
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-src.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499341903&sdata=eriysK%2FfYNS8v%2Bzd1tCb%2BohPjjR0MxdTV78FaJMrBTc%3D&reserved=0
> Java 1.8
> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.14.6
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: y
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> No unapproved binaries: y
> Package
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js-swf.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499341903&sdata=qYRNA39jPDjV2RLiFQsy%2B%2BOS5dI1WuhS59FiN8chFbw%3D&reserved=0
> Binary kit signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
>
> The release is not perfect, but it’s a definite improvement and long
> overdue. I’m voting +1 to get the release out, and we should follow up with
> the issues that were discovered before the next release.
>
> More notes:
> * I was able to use the release to correctly build a complex app.
> * There are issues with URLs including http instead of https and
> references to royale.codeoscopic.com
> <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Froyale.codeoscopic.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=pty%2BLiG7nHmmnu79MFAqJ3FdxmJJEHedjHO91iXi6fs%3D&reserved=0>.
> I fixed this in the develop branch and I don’t think it’s significant enough
> to delay the release.
> * I fixed the small typo that Chris mention in the RELEASE notes in
> develop as well.
> * We should use an apache email address for the signature for the next
> release (should be me), but I did not see anywhere that it’s a requirement —
> just that there’s a valid signature.
> * I’ll have to pay attention to SNAPSHOT references when I do the next
> release. I’m going to need guidance on the best way to handle that.
> * I’m not sure what Chris’ issues were with references in the various meta
> files. I’d like to follow up on that before the next release.
> * I didn’t see an issue with RAT. Not sure what that was about.
> * The failure of ant clean is normal when clean is run twice.
> * Carlos: I think you added OpenSans. Can you add the reference to the
> NOTICE file in develop?
>
>>
>> Am 08.05.20, 13:28 schrieb "[email protected]"
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Hi,
>> This is the vote for the 0.9.7 release of Apache Royale. The release
>> candidate can be found here;
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=wDhf8b2LdDd9TnW8CDuXzDBG1ZP6xkDCUo%2F%2FbqmMn44%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on
>> approving a release?', at:
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Frelease.html%23approving-a-release&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=rQundb9FSLlKjx0tzt7OwBsKyidu4Z1nOLFlGYbWzg0%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
>> - SHA and signed packages are correct
>> - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
>> - That the build script completes successfully
>> - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.
>>
>> The KEYS file is at
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2FKEYS&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=l2nBhO0uw9vnSAxIXu%2FGXK3h9xG0ocmUUO5Q%2BBUt2lI%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos.
>>
>> To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is
>> ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the
>> -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script via:
>> ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml
>>
>> You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be
>> installed via:
>> npm install
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=npcpezRiIRwlrx0tdXFV9JhXeYfIq3jyYhsqV8kffwk%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> The full package with SWF support can be installed via:
>>
>> npm install
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2Fbinaries%2Fapache-royale-0.9.7-bin-js-swf.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=zhf%2Btjp01HvVs%2FPeABNtCPwCwlQFb43Rw9nzpZLqi%2FI%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Maven artifacts are staged here:
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapacheroyale-1077&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=%2BhqWJWkjjobZu2tHTywIXWqomg%2BX4h3yGHQcTP6Nty0%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> +1 Approve the release
>> -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why)
>>
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
>>
>> The vote passes if there is:
>> - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
>> - More positive votes than negative votes
>>
>> Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be
>> many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the RC,
>> but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality that
>> folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in PMC
>> are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their votes
>> will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes.
>>
>> When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
>> version you tested with.
>>
>> For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common
>> steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the
>> package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead:
>> 1) create an empty folder,
>> 2) download into that folder this file:
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2FApproveRoyale.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C61f9e48b7d2547d21e0708d7f70e6461%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637249513499351898&sdata=CFzd3qHnLF3%2FU4Fic2iSZAYVw3K27uhC2VPta8LaK8c%3D&reserved=0
>> 3) run the script:
>> ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.7 -Drc=5
>> If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use:
>> ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.7 -Drc=5
>> -Duse-flash=true
>>
>> You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages
>> and build results are always encouraged.
>>
>> Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
>> this VOTE thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishay Weiss
>>
>
>
>