That means that when the component is finished, I just need to update the
sdk, build and use the component out-of-the-box ?


Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quarta,
10/11/2021 à(s) 10:07:

> Hugo,
>
> You will use DG and other components in the same way as it is currently in
> Royale - in mxml. I haven't check yet your Office Web Add-In, but I'm
> assuming we are doing it similarly. Just an example with current state of
> my code how I'm using DevExpress DG: -> https://paste.apache.org/wdn01
>
>
>
> śr., 10 lis 2021 o 11:02 Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > I didn't think that at first.
> > Each component must be implemented, studied and tested individually.
> > But yes, the DataGrid is probably the most valuable one. I know I will
> use
> > it.
> > Are you doing a normal wrapper like I did for Office Web Add-In or it's
> > something else that I don't know ?
> >
> > So, If I would like to use your code, just check out your repository and
> > integrate this extension directly on my code, just like a normal Royale
> > extension, correct ?
> >
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > 10/11/2021 à(s) 09:54:
> >
> > > Hi Hugo,
> > >
> > > Could you elaborate a bit more for your question of usage ? What are
> you
> > > exactly asking for ?
> > >
> > > At the beginning you will see in potential repository only DG
> > > implementation. I hope when others would like to use DevExpress will
> join
> > > with PR or implementation of other components.
> > >
> > > Thanks for feedback!
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > śr., 10 lis 2021 o 10:50 Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > I just checked out the devexpress js component and this solved the
> > > > AdvancedDataGrid missing.
> > > > I even say that the one that they have it's better than the original
> > from
> > > > Flex.
> > > > The FileManager component it's also so great.
> > > > I'm looking forward for your development.
> > > >
> > > > Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > > 10/11/2021
> > > > à(s) 09:47:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > Uou, that would be a great addition.
> > > > > I'm satisfied with the Jewel base component, however there is
> always
> > > > > something that requires advanced components.
> > > > >
> > > > > By the way, how do you use these advanced components ?
> > > > > I suppose that is not integrated with the base Royale source code.
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > > > > 10/11/2021 à(s) 09:31:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hello Guys,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Lately in our internal project MyAccount [1] we have started to
> > > express
> > > > >> needs of having more sophisticated DataGrid than it's available as
> > > part
> > > > of
> > > > >> Jewel module. After some research we have invested into set of
> > > > components
> > > > >> called DevExpress [2] where we have DG which have all features
> > needed
> > > > for
> > > > >> us and beyond.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I have started integrate DG into Royale which seems to be working
> > > well.
> > > > We
> > > > >> are thinking about exposing this code soon as part of separate
> > > > repository
> > > > >> or maybe put it into Royale as it was in case of MDL [3]. I'm
> > starting
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> discussion to know what do you think guys about that?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Internally we are using payed version of DevExpress, but there is
> > also
> > > > >> "Non
> > > > >> Commercial" version available [4]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://prominic.net/MyAccount
> > > > >> [2] https://js.devexpress.com/
> > > > >> [3]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/develop/frameworks/projects/MaterialDesignLite/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/mdl
> > > > >> [4] https://js.devexpress.com/Buy/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>

Reply via email to