Sounds right. I can help with the actual release. My preference would be for somebody else to take it on with me guiding him or her through the process.
Thanks, Yishay ________________________________ From: Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 10:40 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: What do we need for the next release? I'm okay calling it 1.0. We don't need things to be perfect, and I think we're at a point of calling it stable enough. I'm happy with the state of royale-compiler, and its level of compatibility with other AS3 compilers. Work on royale-asjs has slowed down recently. It seems like big changes aren't likely to be coming any time soon (unless we get some fresh blood, which a 1.0 might help with). If someone wants to declare some specific goals that they feel are necessary for 1.0, that's cool. Otherwise, maybe it's time to rip off the bandage and just say 1.0. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC https://bowlerhat.dev/ On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 11:37 AM Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this the point where we decide whether this release is v.1.0.0? > > > Andrew Wetmore > Assistant VP, Marketing and Publicity, The ASF <https://apache.org> > Editor-Writer, Infra team, The ASF > > Editor, moosehousepress.com > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 6:22 PM Josh Tynjala <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I would argue that the compiler alone includes more than enough > > improvements to justify a new release. I just updated the compiler > release > > notes, and there's a ton of good stuff in there. New AS3 language > features, > > including arrow functions and function type expressions. New compiler > > options and metadata for including JS, CSS, and assets. Restoring the > > ability to embed fonts in SWF. Support for more modern CSS syntax. And > > many, many bug fixes! > > > > I'm with Harbs, though, in that I'd like him to test the new function > type > > expressions a bit more first, just to rule out any major issues that I > > might have missed. > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowler Hat LLC > > https://bowlerhat.dev/ > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:33 AM Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > I see that it is now more than a year since our last release (0.9.12). > Do > > > we have enough new stuff since then to merit a new release soon? What > > > "must" we add before doing such a release? > > > > > > a > > > > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > Assistant VP, Marketing and Publicity, The ASF <http://aparch.org> > > > Editor-Writer, Infra team, The ASF > > > > > > Editor, moosehousepress.com > > > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > > > > > Virus-free.www.avast.com > > > < > > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > > >
