On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 7:08 AM Hugo Ferreira <[email protected]> wrote:
> As someone who has been using Apache Royale *daily in production for many > years*, I’ll be honest: at this point, the version number has become > largely irrelevant to me. > For those who have contributed to Royale getting to where it is today, and who use it regularly, the release number is the probably least important detail. But this is about the least-expensive step we can take to raise our visibility a little bit among those who used to use Royale and moved away; are in the AS3 universe but never tried Royale; or might become curious, no matter what their tech position, as we reach this 'milestone.' Our number of contributors and committers has remained pretty static for lots of years (we recently got a query from the Board about what we are doing to bring in more active folks), and it would be cool if we could see activity from four or five more people to augment what the inmates are doing now. Does naming the release require a vote? I have not seen any comments opposed to the next release being 1.0.0, so we could go with lazy consensus. a Andrew Wetmore Assistant VP, Marketing and Publicity, The ASF <https://apache.org> Editor-Writer, Infra team, The ASF Editor, moosehousepress.com > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
