> Many of the typedefs are very outdated. Autocorrect…
> On Feb 2, 2026, at 9:14 PM, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > My $0.02: > > Royale has bee production ready for years. We probably should have switched > to 1.0 and beyond a long time ago. > > Let’s just do it. > > FWIW, some of the things I’m itching to work on: > > 1. Support for Tailwind. I want to do research into how that works and > brainstorm on how we can best support it. > 2. Compiler speed improvements. I’d like to experiment with AI agents to see > if we can get some easy wins with that. If should be an interesting > experiment. > 3. Similarly, some of the agents are good at porting code. It would be > interesting to let an agent loose o trying for port the compiler from Javato > something else. (Rust maybe?) > 4. Some time back I started on a runtime Markdown renderer with class mapping > to Royale classes. I’d like to finish that. > > I’m going to try to update some of the typedefs before this release. Maybe of > the typedefs are very outdated. > > Harbs > >> On Jan 31, 2026, at 3:43 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 7:08 AM Hugo Ferreira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> As someone who has been using Apache Royale *daily in production for many >>> years*, I’ll be honest: at this point, the version number has become >>> largely irrelevant to me. >>> >> >> For those who have contributed to Royale getting to where it is today, and >> who use it regularly, the release number is the probably least important >> detail. >> >> But this is about the least-expensive step we can take to raise our >> visibility a little bit among those who used to use Royale and moved away; >> are in the AS3 universe but never tried Royale; or might become curious, no >> matter what their tech position, as we reach this 'milestone.' Our number >> of contributors and committers has remained pretty static for lots of years >> (we recently got a query from the Board about what we are doing to bring in >> more active folks), and it would be cool if we could see activity from four >> or five more people to augment what the inmates are doing now. >> >> Does naming the release require a vote? I have not seen any comments >> opposed to the next release being 1.0.0, so we could go with lazy consensus. >> >> a >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Andrew Wetmore >> Assistant VP, Marketing and Publicity, The ASF <https://apache.org> >> Editor-Writer, Infra team, The ASF >> >> Editor, moosehousepress.com >> >> >> >>> >>> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >> Virus-free.www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >
