This occurs when using the latest from git 3.2.11-SNAPSHOT. What commit fixed this?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chilton, Kevin <kevin.chil...@parsons.com> wrote: > Newer versions of Rya use the Rya Details table to keep track of this sort > of metadata. > > - Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: benk...@gmail.com [mailto:benk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John Smith > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:20 PM > To: dev@rya.incubator.apache.org > Subject: On Storing Rya Metadata in the rya_spo table. > > When I perform a scan of the rya_spo table after adding a SINGLE triple, I > see that Rya adds TWO triples, the one I wanted to add and one denoting the > version of Rya. e.g. > > rya_spo> scan > > INSERT DATA { <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > 3A__acme.com_people_Mike&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_ > LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR- > 2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB-pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNK > g&s=Qj2CE5OU2Kd7J_TI_vbvn8rBQ9H9kNRCV5rIb6LIQ_g&e= > <https://urldefense. > proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__acme.com_actions_likes&d= > CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r= > F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB- > pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNKg&s=7nLrYW2h4_TJLRGsknwSLElEiU0rOWCq0aEBoTm9 > Oxo&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > 3A__acme.com_people_John&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_ > LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR- > 2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB-pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNK > g&s=JQhITAdCx3R_9eu35E5N-aIdUBEtseYBtZ5NNdZqkuA&e= > . } > > rya_spo> scan > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__acme. > com_people_Mike&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r= > F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB- > pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNKg&s=Qj2CE5OU2Kd7J_TI_ > vbvn8rBQ9H9kNRCV5rIb6LIQ_g&e= \x00https://urldefense. > proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__acme.com_actions_likes&d= > CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r= > F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB- > pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNKg&s=7nLrYW2h4_TJLRGsknwSLElEiU0rOWCq0aEBoTm9 > Oxo&e= \x00https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > 3A__acme.com_people_John&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_ > LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR- > 2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB-pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNK > g&s=JQhITAdCx3R_9eu35E5N-aIdUBEtseYBtZ5NNdZqkuA&e= \x01\x02 > : [] > urn:org.apache.rya/2012/05#rts\x00urn:org.apache.rya/ > 2012/05#version\x003.0.0\x01\x03 > : [] > > > I suppose keeping track of metadata about the version of Rya that was used > to persist data into Accumulo is useful, but shouldn't this metadata be > stored in a different table? (like a metadata table, or something?). I > imagine users will be surprised if triples they didn't add appear in their > store, and surprising users is a code smell. What are your thoughts? >
