It was checked into 3.2.10. I don't recall if the Rya Details stuff is enabled by default or if it works without using the rya shell to manage your instance. I thought we had a jira ticket relating to version statement, but I'm unable to find it.
- Kevin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Smith Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: On Storing Rya Metadata in the rya_spo table. This occurs when using the latest from git 3.2.11-SNAPSHOT. What commit fixed this? On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Chilton, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > Newer versions of Rya use the Rya Details table to keep track of this > sort of metadata. > > - Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John > Smith > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: On Storing Rya Metadata in the rya_spo table. > > When I perform a scan of the rya_spo table after adding a SINGLE > triple, I see that Rya adds TWO triples, the one I wanted to add and > one denoting the version of Rya. e.g. > > rya_spo> scan > > INSERT DATA { <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-> > 3A__acme.com_people_Mike&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_ > LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR- > 2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB-pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNK > g&s=Qj2CE5OU2Kd7J_TI_vbvn8rBQ9H9kNRCV5rIb6LIQ_g&e= > > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense&d=CwI > BaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIc > nBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=SHqD37o_I0gFPdBJZdwfZQlV5D4jx-yOkpvUN8VrXv > A&s=ybwFRz7voHFDUzHzxHMgAXeocmXjJh_nl_gS50iRjc8&e= .> > proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__acme.com_actions_likes&d= > CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r= > F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB- > pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNKg&s=7nLrYW2h4_TJLRGsknwSLElEiU0rOWCq0aEB > oTm9 Oxo&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-> > 3A__acme.com_people_John&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_ > LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR- > 2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB-pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNK > g&s=JQhITAdCx3R_9eu35E5N-aIdUBEtseYBtZ5NNdZqkuA&e= > . } > > rya_spo> scan > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__acme. > com_people_Mike&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10 > &r= > F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB- > pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNKg&s=Qj2CE5OU2Kd7J_TI_ > vbvn8rBQ9H9kNRCV5rIb6LIQ_g&e= > \x00https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__urldefense&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=SHqD37o_I0gFPdBJZdwfZQlV5D4jx-yOkpvUN8VrXvA&s=ybwFRz7voHFDUzHzxHMgAXeocmXjJh_nl_gS50iRjc8&e= > . > proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__acme.com_actions_likes&d= > CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r= > F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR-2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB- > pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNKg&s=7nLrYW2h4_TJLRGsknwSLElEiU0rOWCq0aEB > oTm9 Oxo&e= \x00https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > 3A__acme.com_people_John&d=CwIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_ > LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=F2yL1qtCQ_8QkxBRIcnBCmOspnR- > 2OEdiXfx4UDEJmU&m=qONz3ysNOVB-pj5N34NddggiKS8dEp1lW3dleNbPNK > g&s=JQhITAdCx3R_9eu35E5N-aIdUBEtseYBtZ5NNdZqkuA&e= \x01\x02 > : [] > urn:org.apache.rya/2012/05#rts\x00urn:org.apache.rya/ > 2012/05#version\x003.0.0\x01\x03 > : [] > > > I suppose keeping track of metadata about the version of Rya that was > used to persist data into Accumulo is useful, but shouldn't this > metadata be stored in a different table? (like a metadata table, or > something?). I imagine users will be surprised if triples they didn't > add appear in their store, and surprising users is a code smell. What are > your thoughts? >
