Hi Kohei, On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:22:34 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > The last code I have send on issue 25478 do not need many things > > before > > being an UNO component, in fact I have just to do some minor > > improvements before working on the interface but, well, I have not take > > the time do to this... > > If I understand it correctly, this code of yours is aiming to replace > the existing regression functionality with better performance, am I > correct on this assertion? That was the intention, yes. But as the new chart implementation got shifted from OOo2.0 to later, things stalled a bit. > Unfortunately, I can't comment on the internal algorithm of your code > since I'm not familiar with the algorithms used, :P Almost nobody is, including me. It's good to have someone like Yoann on our side :-) > http://tools.openoffice.org/CodingGuidelines.html > > You don't necessarily need to read the whole thing, but just the part > that talks about how variables are named and such. Good suggestion. However, in mere mathematical subroutines it might be better to stick with variable names commonly used in technical literature, as this helps in understanding the algorithm and implementation. Other portions may be better readable if adapted to style. Use common sense when judging a particular case instead of following blindly. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter bedevilled I18N transpositionizer. GnuPG key 0x293C05FD: 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
