Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Does this imply that we can actually take a look at the implementation
of an LGPL code and translate it into a different language, say from
Basic to C++ with a new license - one that's more liberal than the
LGPL (again, let's use SISSL as an example), or .... ?
What I think Sander refers to is that SISSL code can link to an LGPL
library. But the library itself must remain LGPL.
Cheers,
Daniel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
