On 5/28/05, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > >Does this imply that we can actually take a look at the implementation > >of an LGPL code and translate it into a different language, say from > >Basic to C++ with a new license - one that's more liberal than the > >LGPL (again, let's use SISSL as an example), or .... ? > > > > > What I think Sander refers to is that SISSL code can link to an LGPL > library. But the library itself must remain LGPL.
Ah. That makes sense in that case. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida OpenOffice.org Calc contributor http://kohei.us/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
