What is the intention here? Do we expect someone to play with old HA? In this case we should mark it obsolete. Or is it something that never worked and was never supported? Then leaving it will just confuse people.
- Alex On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Na Li <[email protected]> wrote: > I prefere to mark it obsolete, so we retain the history. > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Pena <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The new SentryHA design replaced the old design completely + the old > design > > was never released, wasn't it?. Isn't removing the configuration the best > > option? > > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Rams Venkatesh <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Obsolete is more appropriate than completely removing it. > > > > > > -Rams > > > > > > > On 1 Jun 2017, at 10:07 am, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > We have an old page on wiki for configuring Sentry ha - > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/ > > > Sentry+HA+Server+Client+Configuration > > > > . > > > > > > > > I'd like to either remove it or mark it as obsolete. > > > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > > >
