We can mark as obsolete till the current HA is released and then remove it completely.
-Rams > On 1 Jun 2017, at 6:34 pm, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected]> wrote: > > What is the intention here? Do we expect someone to play with old HA? In > this case we should mark it obsolete. Or is it something that never worked > and was never supported? Then leaving it will just confuse people. > > - Alex > >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Na Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I prefere to mark it obsolete, so we retain the history. >> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Pena <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The new SentryHA design replaced the old design completely + the old >> design >>> was never released, wasn't it?. Isn't removing the configuration the best >>> option? >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Rams Venkatesh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Obsolete is more appropriate than completely removing it. >>>> >>>> -Rams >>>> >>>>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 10:07 am, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We have an old page on wiki for configuring Sentry ha - >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/ >>>> Sentry+HA+Server+Client+Configuration >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to either remove it or mark it as obsolete. >>>>> >>>>> Any objections? >>>> >>> >>
