Hmm, seems like I can't edit the page - do I need special permissions for that?
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Rams Venkatesh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We can mark as obsolete till the current HA is released and then remove >> it completely. >> >> -Rams >> >> > On 1 Jun 2017, at 6:34 pm, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > What is the intention here? Do we expect someone to play with old HA? In >> > this case we should mark it obsolete. Or is it something that never >> worked >> > and was never supported? Then leaving it will just confuse people. >> > >> > - Alex >> > >> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Na Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I prefere to mark it obsolete, so we retain the history. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Sergio Pena <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> The new SentryHA design replaced the old design completely + the old >> >> design >> >>> was never released, wasn't it?. Isn't removing the configuration the >> best >> >>> option? >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Rams Venkatesh <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Obsolete is more appropriate than completely removing it. >> >>>> >> >>>> -Rams >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 10:07 am, Alexander Kolbasov <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> We have an old page on wiki for configuring Sentry ha - >> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/ >> >>>> Sentry+HA+Server+Client+Configuration >> >>>>> . >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'd like to either remove it or mark it as obsolete. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Any objections? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >
