> On May 8, 2018, 7:52 p.m., Sergio Pena wrote: > > sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-namenode-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/SentryPermissions.java > > Line 27 (original), 29 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/67006/diff/1/?file=2017908#file2017908line29> > > > > I think we should have information about user here as well. We can use > > the TestSentryPermissions class to test user privileges. > > Na Li wrote: > This update only updates data structure. the processing code will be in a > different jira. After that, we can test as you mentioned.
Then should we change the jira name? The name suggests we are adding user privileges 'Extend PrivilegeInfo to hold user privileges' - Sergio ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67006/#review202676 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 8, 2018, 1:49 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/67006/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 8, 2018, 1:49 p.m.) > > > Review request for sentry, Na Li and Sergio Pena. > > > Bugs: SENTRY-2173 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2173 > > > Repository: sentry > > > Description > ------- > > PrivilegeInfo should be updated to hold the permissions added to the users. > > PrivilegeInfo currently holds roles <=> privileges mapping. This data > structure should be made generic so that it could hold the permissions of > either roles/users on a given object. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-namenode-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/SentryPermissions.java > 3b3a82e8fce7986bd046e96192105952aa6fa796 > > sentry-hdfs/sentry-hdfs-namenode-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/hdfs/UpdateableAuthzPermissions.java > 2ad74403b279fc2feafda361c92bf6a3d259d0eb > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67006/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > As there is not functional change. I juat made sure that all the existing > tests pass. > > > Thanks, > > kalyan kumar kalvagadda > >
