Also added "Improve release schedules" to the list.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your response Joe! > > Yes, items like more project discussions, continued releases and reporting > are on going and we will try to capture their progress in the next few > reports. I have made some concrete items in terms of project direction to > be able to achieve the goal and measure the progress. Do the following > changes look fine? > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > 1. Make project direction more visible > 1. Encourage more feature and direction discussions on the dev list > rather than jira. > 2. Create a roadmap page on wiki, so that there is one place every > one can see what is community working on or aspiring to work on. > 2. Continue reporting monthly on time > 3. Initiate graduation discussion with community and address any > concerns raised > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware > of? > > Community has released Sentry 1.5.1 after fixing the earlier release > issues. Community has fixed all the issues raised except for the ongoing > efforts mentioned in the previous section. > > Appreciate your feedback! > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 07/27/2015 03:53 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: >> > Hello mentors, >> > >> > Looks like we were scheduled for monthly reports only for one month >> > (July). Can we still submit the report this month(August) and do you >> > suggest us to? By the way here is the running report >> >> Monthly should continue, I believe, either for at least three months or >> until the Mentors decide that monthly is no longer a requirement. >> >> The report should be updated as appropriate. >> >> I think the current report insufficiently addresses the concerns that >> David Nalley and I have raised previously. I also don't think that one >> month is sufficient to demonstrate that Sentry is having development >> conversations in the open - as per the concerns that I and David Nalley >> raised a bit ago (June, I believe?). >> >> I am not yet seeing the kind of project-level discussions on the dev >> list that convince me that this is happening - but to be fair, there's >> not been a lot of time and I know it's vacation season for everybody. So >> it's entirely possible that folks are off doing fun things on beaches >> and not so much with the discussing project direction. >> >> Right now, I would consider graduation off the table until Sentry >> addresses the concerns about development discussions, goes a reasonable >> period of time demonstrating that the podling can file reports on time, >> and adds PMC members from a diverse set of organizations. (Adding >> committers is good - but we should have a PMC that reflects the >> diversity of the project as long as there's a distinction between PMC >> and committer.) >> >> Best, >> >> jzb >> >> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/Running+report>. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > Greets, >> > >> > This report reminder was sent in error due to stale records. Sentry >> > is not >> > scheduled to report this month. >> > >> > Marvin Humphrey >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sravya Tirukkovalur >> >> >> -- >> Joe Brockmeier >> [email protected] >> Twitter: @jzb >> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >> > > > > -- > Sravya Tirukkovalur > -- Sravya Tirukkovalur
