Thanks for the response Patrick! Yes, we do have committers from more than
3 organizations.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't see major issues with the report. However "Three most
> important issues to address in the move towards graduation:" seems a
> bit off to me. The following page lists the minimum requirements
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
> there's also the checklist
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#checklist
> items 1 and 3 (on the sentry report) don't seem specifically required
> to me. Nice to haves for a community but not something that should
> hold up graduation.

What's the current level of diversity? Seems like that bar should have
> been met by now, no? I see a long list of commiters
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
> surely 3+ organizations are represented?
>
Patrick
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Prasad Mujumdar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Looks fine to me. Thanks for putting this together Sravya.
> > +1
> >
> > I guess adding affiliations of committers and PPMC on the project page
> > would be useful.
> >
> > thanks
> > Prasad
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Joe,
> >>
> >> Updated the report.
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/Running+report
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Sravya,
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015, at 02:21 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> >> > > Yes, items like more project discussions, continued releases and
> >> > > reporting
> >> > > are on going and we will try to capture their progress in the next
> few
> >> > > reports. I have made some concrete items in terms of project
> direction
> >> to
> >> > > be able to achieve the goal and measure the progress. Do the
> following
> >> > > changes look fine?
> >> >
> >> > I don't see anything here about increasing diversity on the PMC. That
> >> > point from my original email was not addressed.
> >> >
> >> > I would, for the time being, remove #3 and focus on the issues we've
> >> > raised.
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> >
> >> > jzb
> >> > --
> >> > Joe Brockmeier
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > Twitter: @jzb
> >> > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sravya Tirukkovalur
> >>
>



-- 
Sravya Tirukkovalur

Reply via email to