Hi kirin,

Thanks.
I think we should figure out what the users want when they want to reading
the quickstart and userguide.

What liubao doing is to output a comprehensive user guide like
Api-reference book, and the  community lacks of documentation focused
solely on helping users get started.

I think it is quite important to supplement this deficiency, so is our goal
should be focused on the following 3 key points?
1. One simplest sample to show easily Using ServiceComb by one-click.
2. One small sample to show users can make there apps easily have basic
service governance capabilities with ServiceComb.
3. A simple sample corresponding to a functionality of ServiceComb, like
what you mentioned like Spring.

Anyway, you can also finding some place on the website to list and brief
introduce the medium-sized code case, like company,Weather forecast,CRM.



Best Regards,
---
Zen Lin
[email protected]
Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb

2018-05-10 17:50 GMT+08:00 kirin wang <[email protected]>:

> Hi  Community:
>
>          Recently we have recieved some feedback from our user , that our
> documents are not enough quick&clear and sometimes it still causes some
> error. May be we should discuss how to improve it together.
>
>          Take our "Quick Start" as an example[1]:
> 1.  Codes or configs (like "pom.xml" )  are fragment , not the whole file
> ,  some beginners cannot fully understand how to make it work .
> 2.  We introduced  several features like load balance, circuit break etc.
> Currently there are all "under bmi" , which means if one wants to simply
> test one of our feature,  he must learn from start.  Here we may reference
> the docs in spring.io[2] ,  every feature in it can run separately and
> quickly.
> 3. Now we already have "scaffold"  aims to make developing microservices
> via serviceComb more quickly,may be it's necessary to consider integrate
> “scaffold” with current "Quick Start"
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]  http://servicecomb.incubator.apache.org/docs/quick-start/
> [2]  https://spring.io/guides
>

Reply via email to