Yeah,  Nice.
Hi Liubao, Kirin,

I think it is better to have some detail discussion between both of you to
ensure a new set of document can give users a friendly and
three-dimensional experience, includes quick start, user guide, API
reference.

Best Regards,
---
Zen Lin
[email protected]
Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb

2018-05-11 9:31 GMT+08:00 bismy <[email protected]>:

> We are keeping in thinking a way to better guide the first start users.
> Maybe a working project is very good start point.
> However, quick start to tell the basics is also very important.
> Inspired by working project, I write a quick start to let users download
> examples or using archetypes recently provided.
> Please check https://huaweicse.github.io/servicecomb-java-chassis-doc/
> zh_CN/start/first-sample.html
>
>
> We are now working on better ServiceComb-java-chassis documents now, and
> this link is the preview version.
>
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> 发件人: "Zen Lin"<[email protected]>;
> 发送时间: 2018年5月10日(星期四) 晚上7:39
> 收件人: "dev"<[email protected]>;
>
> 主题: Re: [Discussion] Improve documents of serviceComb
>
>
>
> Hi kirin,
>
> Thanks.
> I think we should figure out what the users want when they want to reading
> the quickstart and userguide.
>
> What liubao doing is to output a comprehensive user guide like
> Api-reference book, and the  community lacks of documentation focused
> solely on helping users get started.
>
> I think it is quite important to supplement this deficiency, so is our goal
> should be focused on the following 3 key points?
> 1. One simplest sample to show easily Using ServiceComb by one-click.
> 2. One small sample to show users can make there apps easily have basic
> service governance capabilities with ServiceComb.
> 3. A simple sample corresponding to a functionality of ServiceComb, like
> what you mentioned like Spring.
>
> Anyway, you can also finding some place on the website to list and brief
> introduce the medium-sized code case, like company,Weather forecast,CRM.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> ---
> Zen Lin
> [email protected]
> Focused on Micro Service and Apache ServiceComb
>
> 2018-05-10 17:50 GMT+08:00 kirin wang <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi  Community:
> >
> >          Recently we have recieved some feedback from our user , that our
> > documents are not enough quick&clear and sometimes it still causes some
> > error. May be we should discuss how to improve it together.
> >
> >          Take our "Quick Start" as an example[1]:
> > 1.  Codes or configs (like "pom.xml" )  are fragment , not the whole file
> > ,  some beginners cannot fully understand how to make it work .
> > 2.  We introduced  several features like load balance, circuit break etc.
> > Currently there are all "under bmi" , which means if one wants to simply
> > test one of our feature,  he must learn from start.  Here we may
> reference
> > the docs in spring.io[2] ,  every feature in it can run separately and
> > quickly.
> > 3. Now we already have "scaffold"  aims to make developing microservices
> > via serviceComb more quickly,may be it's necessary to consider integrate
> > “scaffold” with current "Quick Start"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]  http://servicecomb.incubator.apache.org/docs/quick-start/
> > [2]  https://spring.io/guides
> >
>

Reply via email to