2009/4/3 Toni Menzel <[email protected]>: > I am also torn into the possibilities.Putting Karaf under felix will keep > e.g. equinox advocates away (thats why Alex refer's to the devil :) ?) > Also, any possible shortcoming (technical or political) of felix will > directly affect Karaf as a higher level "enterprisy" solution.
Not really - already Felix hosts lots of code which is independent of the actual OSGi runtime code - including a runtime adapter code so most of the Felix project itself can be used on equinox. > On the other hand, the one-shop stop for osgi sounds nice and convinient. > But then you never stop and at best eat up ops4j pax tools as well next > time. > > But to be honest, i never looked at smx4 before it was brought to the felix > list. And Karaf has to "earn" the brand that felix already has. > No real "best" solution at this point i guess. > Maybe someone should (from smx4) should try to formulate a positioning > statement. > Then things may become more clear probably. I wonder if this helps... http://servicemix.apache.org/SMX4KNL/index.html -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
