On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > But I wouldn't be happy if a TLP was pursued only because > there is this perception that Felix subprojects are for Felix only. That > just perpetuates people's ignorance.
This was not the reason for my suggestion, and is to me an important but separate issue. My reasons for suggesting a TLP; - Already seems to have more community involvement than we require. - Multiple projects at the ASF are signaling interest to build on top of it. - OSGi is becoming a household technology, and Felix needs to address the 'umbrella' concerns sooner or later. TLP would avoid adding to that label. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
