On Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:14:29 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> +1 for both ideas.
> 
> I think it all helps users getting starting and using Apache
> ServiceMix, which is all a good thing.
> 
> In the latter case we should also ensure any XML file for ActiveMQ,
> Camel, Spring, Blueprint etc. does not cause the XML parser
> to go online to validate the XML with the schema. I think in the past
> there has been some odd issues with this.

There still is.  We'll likely need to update Blueprint a bit in Aries to fix 
this.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-626

Dan


> 
> So we may want to have a test where you disable internet :)
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Gert Vanthienen
> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > L.S.,
> > 
> > 
> > Looking at mails on the user mailing lists and going by my own
> > production project experience, I'm seeing two use cases for ServiceMix
> > where we could support our user base by providing new packaging
> > options for Apache ServiceMix.
> > 
> > 1). A lot of our users seem to be using only Camel/ActiveMQ (and
> > perhaps CXF) on their Karaf runtimes.  Many people don't have a use
> > case for JBI/NMR and then decide to just create the container they are
> > looking for by adding things on top of Karaf directly.  I think it
> > would be a good idea to add a apache-servicemix-4.x.0-minimal
> > distribution which only packages and installs these basic bundles and
> > leaves everything else there as optional features.  Given that we are
> > recommending the use of Camel/ActiveMQ/CXF over JBI/NMR ourselves a
> > lot, we should really have our distribution represent that
> > recommendation.  Over time, we might even consider making this the
> > default download and renaming the existing one to
> > apache-servicemix-4.x.0-jbi instead or something.
> > 
> > 2). Another question we occasionally see on the mailing lists is from
> > users that are running ServiceMix on machines that don't have internet
> > access and that are having a hard time installing optional features.
> > In order to cater for that need, we could add an
> > apache-servicemix-4.x.0-full distribution that contains bundles for
> > all the features we ship with, regardless of whether they're installed
> > by default or not.  A quick test shows that it would become over 200
> > MB in size, which might make the release process a bit heavy, but one
> > other hand: there's definitely a user base for this kind of convenient
> > all-in-one download as well.
> > 
> > What do people think about adding these two packaging options?
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Gert Vanthienen
> > ------------------------
> > FuseSource
> > Web: http://fusesource.com
> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to