+1 for both ideas.

Thanks
Freeman
On 2011-7-20, at 下午11:16, Gert Vanthienen wrote:

L.S.,


Looking at mails on the user mailing lists and going by my own
production project experience, I'm seeing two use cases for ServiceMix
where we could support our user base by providing new packaging
options for Apache ServiceMix.

1). A lot of our users seem to be using only Camel/ActiveMQ (and
perhaps CXF) on their Karaf runtimes.  Many people don't have a use
case for JBI/NMR and then decide to just create the container they are
looking for by adding things on top of Karaf directly.  I think it
would be a good idea to add a apache-servicemix-4.x.0-minimal
distribution which only packages and installs these basic bundles and
leaves everything else there as optional features.  Given that we are
recommending the use of Camel/ActiveMQ/CXF over JBI/NMR ourselves a
lot, we should really have our distribution represent that
recommendation.  Over time, we might even consider making this the
default download and renaming the existing one to
apache-servicemix-4.x.0-jbi instead or something.

2). Another question we occasionally see on the mailing lists is from
users that are running ServiceMix on machines that don't have internet
access and that are having a hard time installing optional features.
In order to cater for that need, we could add an
apache-servicemix-4.x.0-full distribution that contains bundles for
all the features we ship with, regardless of whether they're installed
by default or not.  A quick test shows that it would become over 200
MB in size, which might make the release process a bit heavy, but one
other hand: there's definitely a user base for this kind of convenient
all-in-one download as well.

What do people think about adding these two packaging options?


Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang

FuseSource
Email:[email protected]
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com









Reply via email to