Good points Jean-Baptiste, I appreciate your proposal and I think you have a good situation awareness of the project to give the best indications to go fast to a release, (and I like especially this last aspect :-) ).
P.S. I'm still waiting confirmation that next version will be developed here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx5/trunk/ or please tell me where :-P 2014-02-14 14:10 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > Good morning gentlemen, > > Depending of the timeline, I would propose (and prefer ;)): > - ServiceMix 5 using Karaf 2.3.4 (in vote today) > - ServiceMix 6 using Karaf 3.0.1 or 3.0.2 (that will be stable) > > Especially, using Karaf 3.0.1, we have some overlap that I would like to > cleanup. For instance, it would be possible to remove ServiceMix Naming and > replace with Karaf JNDI instead (which provide a JNDI Context now). > > So, to avoid to postpone SMX 5 too far, I would release with Karaf stable > branch (2.3.x), and prepare SMX6 with Karaf 3.0.x. > > Moreover, we don't have a lot of feedback/update from the other projects > (Camel, CXF, ActiveMQ, ...) with Karaf 3.0.x. > > Regards > JB > > > On 02/14/2014 11:01 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> +1, especially for using Karaf 3.0.1 with Servicemix 5, >> >> Karaf 3.0.1 because we already identified some rather nasty bugs with >> Karaf >> that shouldn't spoil a ServiceMix 5 ;) >> >> regards, Achim >> >> >> 2014-02-14 10:55 GMT+01:00 Cristiano Costantini < >> [email protected]>: >> >> My opinion: >>> Servicemix 5.0.0 -> Karaf 3.0.0 >>> then branch and Servicemix 4.9.0 -> latest Karaf 2.3.x >>> >>> this because jumping from 2.2.11 to 3.0.0 may be a big step and it's good >>> to have something in between >>> and I would assign this the version number 4.9 to mark it is still big >>> step >>> that discontinues from the previous versions, and something that leads to >>> the next big revision >>> >>> (I remember that firefox did something like this from version 3.1 to 3.5 >>> so >>> to mark the big changes even if not upgrading to major version, this >>> before >>> startying to release a new version every 6 weeks :-) ) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-02-14 10:14 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak < >>> [email protected] >>> >>>> : >>>> >>> >>> Hi >>>> >>>> Due to the training for my company I couldn't follow the whole >>>> discussion >>>> about future of ServiceMix5. Are we going to upgrade it to Karaf 3.x or >>>> will it be released on basis of Karaf 2.x? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Krzysztof >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13.02.2014 09:53, Gert Vanthienen wrote: >>>> >>>> L.S., >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Moving the discussion from the users@ to dev@ mailing list, it would >>>>> be good to figure out how to go about things. >>>>> >>>>> For now, I would propose we avoid adding any extra complexity and just >>>>> focus on getting a simple assembly project in place that combines the >>>>> latest and greatest bits of ActiveMQ, CXF, Camel, Karaf, ... >>>>> >>>>> How about we start with the ServiceMix 5 codebase, remove the new >>>>> Camel interceptor bits for now and just focus on getting the assembly >>>>> itself, the examples and the integration tests working? That way, we >>>>> should have a fairly manageable amount of work to perform before we >>>>> can get to a new release. >>>>> >>>>> We have a board report coming up in March, so we can convey this new >>>>> direction in that. Perhaps we should use the next board report after >>>>> that as a checkpoint to see if we are making any progress: by then, I >>>>> think we should have been able to do at least one or two releases and >>>>> we should have found a few people that are willing/able to help out >>>>> with the work. If we have not made any progress on the community >>>>> aspect by then, it may be a good time to reflect on how to gracefully >>>>> move people over to a plain Karaf/CXF/Camel/... solution instead. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wdyt? >>>>> >>>>> Gert Vanthienen >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak >>>> >>>> JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini >>>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center < >>>> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw >>>> e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | >>>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
