Ok clear, So is a good question for the community: - should SMX 5 start from scratch or from actually can be found at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx5/trunk/
? Il venerdì 14 febbraio 2014, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> ha scritto: > I meant following: > > * If we want to start ServiceMix 5 again from the beginning (by > removing the current code base and creating a new custom Karaf 3.x > distribution) we could do following instead: > o we could release ServiceMix 5 in the current form (with Karaf > 2.3 or 2.4) if we think ServiceMix is stable and we don't want > to remove the current work > o start ServiceMix 6 from the beginning using Karaf 3.x > > But if there is no reason to release ServiceMix 5 in the current > form we can restart ServiceMix 5 with Karaf 3.x > > * if we want only to upgrade ServiceMix 5 (without restarting the > sources) then ServiceMix 5 should be upgraded to Karaf 3.x. > > > On 14.02.2014 11:55, Cristiano Costantini wrote: > >> I've not understood clearly, you would base SMX5 on Karaf 2.3.3 and SMX6 >> on >> Karaf 3.0.0 ? >> >> I prefer to align major version upgrades to those of Karaf, so SMX 4.x on >> Karaf 2.x and SMX 5 on Karaf 3,but any of the two is good for me. >> >> >> 2014-02-14 11:06 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected] >> >: >> >> I prefer the solution with restart of the ServiceMix code base and build >>> it from scratch based on Karaf 3.x (we could use the new plugins and the >>> new configuration files from Karaf). But I saw the current version of >>> ServiceMix 5 has been updated to the newest version of Karaf 2.3.x and >>> the >>> problems I had when I was trying to perform the upgrade to 2.3.3 was only >>> caused by the sclala library. >>> >>> I haven't fully tested ServiceMix 5, but the samples I have tested make >>> no >>> problems. When ServiceMix 5 is almost stable perhaps we could fix the >>> existing issues and release it in this form (based on Karaf 2.3.x, >>> probably >>> upgraded later to Karaf 2.4.x) and start ServiceMix 6 from scratch based >>> on >>> Karaf 3.x and Karaf features. I think people have made some good work to >>> make ServiceMix5 and perhaps we shouldn't send it into /dev/null :) What >>> do >>> you think about this? >>> >>> Regards >>> Krzysztof >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center < > http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > Twitter: @KSobkowiak >
