I'd start with Karaf 3 for ServiceMix 5, especially since Karaf 2.4 isn't released yet. And I'd use the 4.x line for Karaf 2.x
but that's my 2 cents ;) regards, Achim 2014-02-14 13:07 GMT+01:00 Cristiano Costantini < [email protected]>: > Ok clear, > So is a good question for the community: > - should SMX 5 start from scratch or from actually can be found at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx5/trunk/ > > ? > > > Il venerdì 14 febbraio 2014, Krzysztof Sobkowiak > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > [email protected]');>> > ha scritto: > > > I meant following: > > > > * If we want to start ServiceMix 5 again from the beginning (by > > removing the current code base and creating a new custom Karaf 3.x > > distribution) we could do following instead: > > o we could release ServiceMix 5 in the current form (with Karaf > > 2.3 or 2.4) if we think ServiceMix is stable and we don't want > > to remove the current work > > o start ServiceMix 6 from the beginning using Karaf 3.x > > > > But if there is no reason to release ServiceMix 5 in the current > > form we can restart ServiceMix 5 with Karaf 3.x > > > > * if we want only to upgrade ServiceMix 5 (without restarting the > > sources) then ServiceMix 5 should be upgraded to Karaf 3.x. > > > > > > On 14.02.2014 11:55, Cristiano Costantini wrote: > > > >> I've not understood clearly, you would base SMX5 on Karaf 2.3.3 and SMX6 > >> on > >> Karaf 3.0.0 ? > >> > >> I prefer to align major version upgrades to those of Karaf, so SMX 4.x > on > >> Karaf 2.x and SMX 5 on Karaf 3,but any of the two is good for me. > >> > >> > >> 2014-02-14 11:06 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak < > [email protected] > >> >: > >> > >> I prefer the solution with restart of the ServiceMix code base and > build > >>> it from scratch based on Karaf 3.x (we could use the new plugins and > the > >>> new configuration files from Karaf). But I saw the current version of > >>> ServiceMix 5 has been updated to the newest version of Karaf 2.3.x and > >>> the > >>> problems I had when I was trying to perform the upgrade to 2.3.3 was > only > >>> caused by the sclala library. > >>> > >>> I haven't fully tested ServiceMix 5, but the samples I have tested make > >>> no > >>> problems. When ServiceMix 5 is almost stable perhaps we could fix the > >>> existing issues and release it in this form (based on Karaf 2.3.x, > >>> probably > >>> upgraded later to Karaf 2.4.x) and start ServiceMix 6 from scratch > based > >>> on > >>> Karaf 3.x and Karaf features. I think people have made some good work > to > >>> make ServiceMix5 and perhaps we shouldn't send it into /dev/null :) > What > >>> do > >>> you think about this? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Krzysztof > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > -- > > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > > > JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini > > Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center < > > http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw > > e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > > Twitter: @KSobkowiak > > > -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
