For Serviecemix 5 a prefer to use karaf 3.0.* too. For me is +1 Regards
--Filippo 2014-02-15 23:17 GMT+01:00 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>: > L.S., > > > In the "Plan for ServiceMix 5" thread, we've seen a few proposals on > how to deal with the upgrade to Karaf 3. I think this discussion > definitely merits a thread of its own. > > Personally, I would prefer to do a ServiceMix 5 release with Karaf 3 > if possible, but I'm not sure how stable/unstable this actually is at > the moment. The 3.0.0 release definitely had a few issues, but a lot > of them have already been addressed and I think I even saw a 3.0.1 on > the roadmap for the next few weeks. > > If this delay is all it takes to get that upgrade in ServiceMix 5, I > think we should do that. However, we do not really know big the > problem is. Perhaps someone could give it a go and try to figure out > how big of an issue this upgrade is? The effort should definitely not > be in vain, we can always commit it to another branch and start > working on a later release there if necessary. Any volunteers? > > If we see it will just take a few more weeks to get everything in > order for a Karaf 3-based release, we can always do a release > candidate or two to show the world we're actually moving again and to > get some feedback from the community on where we're headed - that time > can actually come in quite handy to work on docs, for example. > However, if the research shows that things will take too long, we > probably have to come up with a 2.3.x-based release first anyway. > > > Wdyt? > > Gert Vanthienen >
