Hi
I think somebody should start the vote. We have 2 options:
* SMX 5 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 6 with Karaf 3.x
* SMX 4.9 with Karaf 2.3.x and SMX 5 with Karaf 3.x
Regards
Krzysztof
On 17.02.2014 16:59, Cristiano Costantini wrote:
I've already repeated my position up to be annoying :-) but I repeat that
for me either solutions are ok
Maybe a quick vote could be the fastest and more democratic way to take a
decision ?s
Could someone please summarize the available options?
Regards,
Cristiano
2014-02-17 16:53 GMT+01:00 Gert Vanthienen <[email protected]>:
Hi Raul,
Yeah, I think 4.9.0 is a bit of a strange version number as well. But
you're also right that some users will take a bit longer to move over
to Karaf 3. What's more: the version may not even be as temporary
for us as we would hope, perhaps we end up doing another release in
that series if people in the community are asking about another Karaf
2.x based release after this one.
We do want that to be based on the current ServiceMix 5 codebase
(without JBI/NMR) and not on the current ServiceMix 4.x codebase?
Because the latter was the original plan and we failed to get any
contributors to help out with that effort.
I do wonder if we won't end up confusing people as well, when
ServiceMix 4.6.0 suddenly no longer has any JBI/NMR support in there.
We can probably communicate that though, so it might not be that big a
problem, but we might also want to reconsider Krzysztof's proposal to
go with 5.x for the Karaf 2.x-based assemblies without JBI/NMR (and we
can have a few of those, using Karaf 2.3.x and 2.4.x) and use 6.x for
the Karaf 3-based assemblies.
