Hi Peter,
The JMSFlow does supersede the ClusterFlow - and to reduce our
maintenance effort - when you use the cluster flow type - you are in
fact using the JMSFlow - if that makes sense ?
cheers,
Rob
On 16 Nov 2005, at 02:10, Peter Smith wrote:
The JMSFlow and the ClusterFlow implementations seem kind of similar.
Does JMSFlow supercede ClusterFlow?
Or if not, what are the pros/cons of choosing one over the other?
Are there any architecture details other than what is written at
http://www.servicemix.org/NMR+Flows. At the moment I am just
staring at source code but I am not familiar with ActiveMQ so it is
slow going....
Thanks,
Peter.
