OK. I missed that sneaky trick now in
META-INF\services\org\servicemix\jbi\nmr\flow\cluster ;-)
But now I'm not sure why the ClusterFlow class still exists at all. Is
it kept around just for people who were previously using it in case they
want to explicitly continue using it (eg by manually changing the conent
of their 'cluster' resource file back to what it was).
Thanks.
Peter.
Rob Davies wrote:
Hi Peter,
The JMSFlow does supersede the ClusterFlow - and to reduce our
maintenance effort - when you use the cluster flow type - you are in
fact using the JMSFlow - if that makes sense ?
cheers,
Rob
On 16 Nov 2005, at 02:10, Peter Smith wrote:
The JMSFlow and the ClusterFlow implementations seem kind of similar.
Does JMSFlow supercede ClusterFlow?
Or if not, what are the pros/cons of choosing one over the other?
Are there any architecture details other than what is written at
http://www.servicemix.org/NMR+Flows. At the moment I am just staring
at source code but I am not familiar with ActiveMQ so it is slow
going....
Thanks,
Peter.
