er - it's kept around cause I was having trouble deleting it from svn
through eclipse. I'll figure it out someday :)
On 16 Nov 2005, at 21:48, Peter Smith wrote:
OK. I missed that sneaky trick now in META-INF\services\org
\servicemix\jbi\nmr\flow\cluster ;-)
But now I'm not sure why the ClusterFlow class still exists at all.
Is it kept around just for people who were previously using it in
case they want to explicitly continue using it (eg by manually
changing the conent of their 'cluster' resource file back to what
it was).
Thanks.
Peter.
Rob Davies wrote:
Hi Peter,
The JMSFlow does supersede the ClusterFlow - and to reduce our
maintenance effort - when you use the cluster flow type - you are
in fact using the JMSFlow - if that makes sense ?
cheers,
Rob
On 16 Nov 2005, at 02:10, Peter Smith wrote:
The JMSFlow and the ClusterFlow implementations seem kind of
similar.
Does JMSFlow supercede ClusterFlow?
Or if not, what are the pros/cons of choosing one over the other?
Are there any architecture details other than what is written at
http://www.servicemix.org/NMR+Flows. At the moment I am just
staring at source code but I am not familiar with ActiveMQ so it
is slow going....
Thanks,
Peter.
