>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 7/13/06, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > > Yea, that's what I meant. Do you think we need a dtds and schema folders > under the shale site, or just a dtds folder. With the DTD's loaded from the > classpath we might not even need to publish them on the web site. > > > > shale.apache.org/dtds > > Infrastructure would probably be happy if we didn't publish them on > the website. :) But it is convenient when JEdit just grabs the DTD > and starts complaining if the document doesn't validate. > > > I have one XSD that I could publish for clay html namespace support. In the > future, we might have a couple more for Clay's version of the core and html > schema. The clay markup parser is not validating so these would only be > needed > for tool support. > > Is there a 'standard' location for schemas? Sun uses > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd . > > Maybe shale.apache.org/xml/ ? >
Seems like a good idea to me. Do we have an open JIRA issue or should I create a new one for this? I'll commit the source changes. I was removing the redundant /shale/ in the tag library URI's for shale and clay too. > -- > Wendy
