On 7/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm +1 on the change, but I'd also like to see us leave the physical artifacts with the old names under the Struts website, as long as they're willing to do that. Otherwise, we can set up HTTP redirects that point at the correct places in the Shale website.
I'm vaguely concerned that the tools that are using those dtds (mostly validating editors, I think,) won't be able to handle redirects. I'd like to see what JEdit does, at least. The Shale DTDs can stay there at Struts until we figure out how best to handle it.
For the Shale website, I do think we need a "dtds" directory that is part of the website build, and which includes the physical artifacts we're talking about.
I added that to Struts 1 the other day... though now that I think about it, I'm not entirely sure why I introduced a /resources directory instead of just copying them to a /dtds directory! I'll change it, and then do the same thing for Shale. The DTDs and schemas should live under src/main/resources in the module they belong to, so they'll be in the right place in the jar file, and we'll use antrun to copy them for the website. -- Wendy
