On 1/4/07, Gregg Leichtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In that case, to avoid duplicating information, what about putting a one
sentence blurb in the release notes referencing that file and the version
information it contains?
<snip/>
Its also available on the website, the dependency page for shale-tiles is here:
http://shale.apache.org/shale-tiles/dependencies.html
(similarly for other modules -- for each module, the 'Project
Documentation' section in the left side navbar has this, and other,
information). You are correct that this is easier to find for those
familiar with Maven (since it generates the site).
Additionally, note that the framework distribution (nightlies or
release) contains all dependency jars in the lib folder, if you
inspect it, you will find the jar you need, which is, in this case:
tiles-core-2.0-r468346-SNAPSHOT.jar
-Rahul
Due to my inexperience with Maven, I would not have known to look in that
location for version info.
-=> Gregg <=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> These are listed in the various profiles in the Maven POM file.
>
> Hermod
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregg Leichtman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 12:56 PM
> To: dev@shale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FWD: [v1.0.4] shale-tiles and release notes (was Re: svn
> commit: r490857 ...)]
>
>
> Just a suggestion. It would be helpful, to me at least, if you were to
> include within the release notes one or more snapshot version numbers of
> standalone Tiles, one or more version numbers of Spring and one or more
> version numbers of other targeted components that work with Shale with
> which you the development group believes v1.0.4 appears to work. I
> realize that items like Tiles in sandboxes are fast moving targets, but
> it helps us users avoid having to do a lot of trial and error just to
> find a single combination of components that works. If we have one
> working set, substituting different components one at a time using trial
> and error during component upgrades is far less burdensome that not
> knowing anything about what works together.
>
> -=> Gregg <=-
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> On 12/29/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>>> From: "Rahul Akolkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Date: Thu, December 28, 2006 4:56 pm
>>>>> To: commits@shale.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> The above "projected quality" paragraph needs to be updated to
>>>>>
>>> reflect
>>>
>>>>> the current sentiment. Of the two items in that list, 1.0.4 will
>>>>> address most of the dialog issues (so I've removed that).
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone more familiar with shale-tiles (and changes implied by going
>>>>> TLP) should update the above paragraph in the release notes. TIA.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> The TLP hasn't changed the status of Tiles just yet. Tiles will
>>> still be a
>>> snapshot for a while because it will take some time to get the TLP
>>> infrastructure set up.
>>>
>>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Thanks, the related bits are in section 1 and 4 of the release notes
>> -- you're welcome (as is everyone else) to tweak the wording (long,
>> possibly fragmented URL):
>>
>>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shale/framework/trunk/src/site/resources/docs/release-notes-1.0.4.html
>>
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that the DnB NOR Group
> cannot accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence with
> customers as a part of an email.
>
> This email message has been virus checked by the anti virus programs used
> in the DnB NOR Group.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
>
