Very cool, I will be checking that out.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:40 PM, "Dan Dumont" <[email protected]> wrote: > You may also want to consider some work that's been recently committed to > allow all views of a gadget to share a reference to a single iframe on the > page that code can be loaded in and shared between all instances of that > gadget (regardless of view rendering). > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/1749/ > > This allows you to leverage the safety of browser sandboxing while also > allowing you to keep all of your code in a single, persistent window. > This code will be expanded soon in a new feature that allows several > gadgets to share in the use of a single shared-script-frame, even when > rendering with locked domains. > > > > From: Rob Keane <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: 09/23/2011 03:36 PM > Subject: Re: Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > > > Excellent! > > IFrames come with a decent amount of overhead and we'd love to be able to > share common libraries and CSS between gadgets without loading them over > and over again individually. > > Those issues have caused some undesirable performance hits on older > browsers and hardware. > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Michael Beaver <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, Rob. >> >> We're planning on submitting a preview of our inline work early next > week to the community and would love to work with you on assessing the > approach. There are a number of items we're still working on but feel > that it would be beneficial to get some feedback from the community while > it's still in progress. The 3.0 approach is different from the inline > patch that was based on 2.0.2, and instead operates as a container mixin > to avoid massive modification of core container code. The result is a > significantly cleaner approach. >> >> Also, we'd really like to understand what requirements and functionality > your company is interested in for rendering gadgets inline, so hopefully > this early preview can be used to help drive that discussion. >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Michael Beaver >> IBM Lotus >> 919-254-7007 (T/L 444) >> >> Rob Keane ---09/22/2011 01:46:18 PM---My company is very interested in > inline rendering and the 3.0 release. Will this feature be include >> >> >> From: >> >> Rob Keane <[email protected]> >> >> To: >> >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> Date: >> >> 09/22/2011 01:46 PM >> >> Subject: >> >> Inline rendering and 3.0 Release >> >> >> >> My company is very interested in inline rendering and the 3.0 release. >> >> Will this feature be included in the release, will it be in a beta > release if so? >> >> Is there any rough timeline for the 3.0 release? >> >> Apologies if these questions have already been addressed, I was unable > to find an answer. >> > > >
